[llvm] [llvm][AsmPrinter] Call graph section format. (PR #159866)

[Paul Kirth via llvm-commits]

================
@@ -36,24 +42,50 @@ entry:
 !4 = !{!5}
 !5 = !{i64 0, !"_ZTSFPvS_E.generalized"}
 
-; CHECK: .section .callgraph,"o", at progbits,.text
+; X64: .section .callgraph,"o", at progbits,.text
+;; Version
+; X64-NEXT: .byte   0
+;; Flags
+; X64-NEXT: .byte   7
+;; Function Entry PC
+; X64-NEXT: .quad   [[LABEL_FUNC]]
+;; Function type ID -- set to 0 as no type metadata attached to function.
+; X64-NEXT: .quad   0
+;; Number of unique direct callees.
+; X64-NEXT: .byte	  3
+;; Direct callees.
+; X64-NEXT: .quad	direct_foo
+; X64-NEXT: .quad	direct_bar
+; X64-NEXT: .quad	direct_baz
+;; Number of unique indirect target type IDs.
+; X64-NEXT: .byte   3
+;; Indirect type IDs.
+; X64-NEXT: .quad   4524972987496481828
+; X64-NEXT: .quad   3498816979441845844
+; X64-NEXT: .quad   8646233951371320954
+
+; ARM32: .section .callgraph,"o",%progbits,.text
 ;; Version
-; CHECK-NEXT: .byte   0
+; ARM32-NEXT: .byte   0
 ;; Flags
-; CHECK-NEXT: .byte   7
+; ARM32-NEXT: .byte   7
 ;; Function Entry PC
-; CHECK-NEXT: .quad   [[LABEL_FUNC]]
+; ARM32-NEXT: .long   [[LABEL_FUNC]]
 ;; Function type ID -- set to 0 as no type metadata attached to function.
-; CHECK-NEXT: .quad   0
+; ARM32-NEXT: .long   0
+; ARM32-NEXT: .long   0
 ;; Number of unique direct callees.
-; CHECK-NEXT: .byte	  3
+; ARM32-NEXT: .byte	  3
 ;; Direct callees.
-; CHECK-NEXT: .quad	direct_foo
-; CHECK-NEXT: .quad	direct_bar
-; CHECK-NEXT: .quad	direct_baz
+; ARM32-NEXT: .long	direct_foo
+; ARM32-NEXT: .long	direct_bar
+; ARM32-NEXT: .long	direct_baz
 ;; Number of unique indirect target type IDs.
-; CHECK-NEXT: .byte   3
+; ARM32-NEXT: .byte   3
 ;; Indirect type IDs.
-; CHECK-NEXT: .quad   4524972987496481828
-; CHECK-NEXT: .quad   3498816979441845844
-; CHECK-NEXT: .quad   8646233951371320954
+; ARM32-NEXT: .long 838288420
+; ARM32-NEXT: .long 1053552373
+; ARM32-NEXT: .long 1505527380
+; ARM32-NEXT: .long 814631809
+; ARM32-NEXT: .long 342417018
+; ARM32-NEXT: .long 2013108216
----------------
ilovepi wrote:

I don't think you can put this in a test under `CodeGen/X86`. You'd need to dupe it under `CodeGen/ARM`

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/159866