[llvm] 197e77b - [X86] Create special case for (a-b) - (a<b) -> sbb a, b (#161388)
via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Oct 2 08:15:32 PDT 2025
Author: AZero13
Date: 2025-10-02T23:15:28+08:00
New Revision: 197e77b33d344c162b8c87de8aa7ddd942f50874
URL: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/197e77b33d344c162b8c87de8aa7ddd942f50874
DIFF: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/197e77b33d344c162b8c87de8aa7ddd942f50874.diff
LOG: [X86] Create special case for (a-b) - (a<b) -> sbb a, b (#161388)
Added:
Modified:
llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp
llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/sbb.ll
Removed:
################################################################################
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp b/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp
index 34854e4d8b6c0..cda5568a2cb59 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp
@@ -52388,16 +52388,41 @@ static SDValue combineAddOrSubToADCOrSBB(bool IsSub, const SDLoc &DL, EVT VT,
// Do not flip "e > c", where "c" is a constant, because Cmp instruction
// cannot take an immediate as its first operand.
//
- if (EFLAGS.getOpcode() == X86ISD::SUB && EFLAGS.getNode()->hasOneUse() &&
- EFLAGS.getValueType().isInteger() &&
- !isa<ConstantSDNode>(EFLAGS.getOperand(1))) {
- SDValue NewSub =
- DAG.getNode(X86ISD::SUB, SDLoc(EFLAGS), EFLAGS.getNode()->getVTList(),
- EFLAGS.getOperand(1), EFLAGS.getOperand(0));
- SDValue NewEFLAGS = NewSub.getValue(EFLAGS.getResNo());
+ // If EFLAGS is from a CMP that compares the same operands as the earlier
+ // SUB producing X (i.e. CMP X, Y), we can directly use the carry flag with
+ // SBB/ADC without creating a flipped SUB.
+ if (EFLAGS.getOpcode() == X86ISD::CMP &&
+ EFLAGS.getValueType().isInteger() && X == EFLAGS.getOperand(0)) {
return DAG.getNode(IsSub ? X86ISD::SBB : X86ISD::ADC, DL,
DAG.getVTList(VT, MVT::i32), X,
- DAG.getConstant(0, DL, VT), NewEFLAGS);
+ DAG.getConstant(0, DL, VT), EFLAGS);
+ }
+
+ if (EFLAGS.getOpcode() == X86ISD::SUB &&
+ EFLAGS.getValueType().isInteger() &&
+ !isa<ConstantSDNode>(EFLAGS.getOperand(1))) {
+ // Only create NewSub if we know one of the folds will succeed to avoid
+ // introducing a temporary node that may persist and affect one-use checks
+ // below.
+ if (EFLAGS.getNode()->hasOneUse()) {
+ SDValue NewSub = DAG.getNode(
+ X86ISD::SUB, SDLoc(EFLAGS), EFLAGS.getNode()->getVTList(),
+ EFLAGS.getOperand(1), EFLAGS.getOperand(0));
+ SDValue NewEFLAGS = NewSub.getValue(EFLAGS.getResNo());
+ return DAG.getNode(IsSub ? X86ISD::SBB : X86ISD::ADC, DL,
+ DAG.getVTList(VT, MVT::i32), X,
+ DAG.getConstant(0, DL, VT), NewEFLAGS);
+ }
+
+ if (IsSub && X == EFLAGS.getValue(0)) {
+ SDValue NewSub = DAG.getNode(
+ X86ISD::SUB, SDLoc(EFLAGS), EFLAGS.getNode()->getVTList(),
+ EFLAGS.getOperand(1), EFLAGS.getOperand(0));
+ SDValue NewEFLAGS = NewSub.getValue(EFLAGS.getResNo());
+ return DAG.getNode(X86ISD::SBB, DL, DAG.getVTList(VT, MVT::i32),
+ EFLAGS.getOperand(0), EFLAGS.getOperand(1),
+ NewEFLAGS);
+ }
}
}
diff --git a/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/sbb.ll b/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/sbb.ll
index 78d609d3a17e6..f5a34688d67b5 100644
--- a/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/sbb.ll
+++ b/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/sbb.ll
@@ -365,3 +365,32 @@ define i32 @uge_sext_add(i32 %0, i32 %1, i32 %2) {
%6 = add nsw i32 %5, %0
ret i32 %6
}
+
+define i32 @sub_sub_ugt(i32 %a, i32 %b) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: sub_sub_ugt:
+; CHECK: # %bb.0:
+; CHECK-NEXT: movl %edi, %eax
+; CHECK-NEXT: cmpl %edi, %esi
+; CHECK-NEXT: sbbl %esi, %eax
+; CHECK-NEXT: retq
+ %cmp = icmp ugt i32 %a, %b
+ %conv = zext i1 %cmp to i32
+ %sub = sub i32 %a, %b
+ %res = sub i32 %sub, %conv
+ ret i32 %res
+}
+
+define i32 @sub_sub_ult(i32 %a, i32 %b) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: sub_sub_ult:
+; CHECK: # %bb.0:
+; CHECK-NEXT: movl %edi, %eax
+; CHECK-NEXT: cmpl %edi, %esi
+; CHECK-NEXT: sbbl %esi, %eax
+; CHECK-NEXT: retq
+ %cmp = icmp ult i32 %b, %a
+ %conv = zext i1 %cmp to i32
+ %sub = sub i32 %a, %b
+ %res = sub i32 %sub, %conv
+ ret i32 %res
+}
+
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list