[llvm] [DropUnnecessaryAssumes] Make the ephemeral value check more precise (PR #160700)
Ramkumar Ramachandra via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Sep 25 13:56:22 PDT 2025
================
@@ -17,13 +18,44 @@ using namespace llvm;
using namespace llvm::PatternMatch;
static bool affectedValuesAreEphemeral(ArrayRef<Value *> Affected) {
- // If all the affected uses have only one use (part of the assume), then
- // the assume does not provide useful information. Note that additional
- // users may appear as a result of inlining and CSE, so we should only
- // make this assumption late in the optimization pipeline.
- // TODO: Handle dead cyclic usages.
- // TODO: Handle multiple dead assumes on the same value.
- return all_of(Affected, match_fn(m_OneUse(m_Value())));
+ // Check whether all the uses are ephemeral, i.e. recursively only used
+ // by assumes. In that case, the assume does not provide useful information.
+ // Note that additional users may appear as a result of inlining and CSE,
+ // so we should only make this assumption late in the optimization pipeline.
+ SmallSetVector<User *, 16> Worklist;
+ auto AddUser = [&](User *U) {
+ // Bail out if we need to inspect too many users.
+ if (Worklist.size() >= 32)
+ return false;
+ Worklist.insert(U);
+ return true;
+ };
+
+ for (Value *V : Affected)
+ for (User *U : V->users())
+ if (!AddUser(U))
+ return false;
----------------
artagnon wrote:
Maybe add a quick comment saying that all affected values should be treated ephemeral?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/160700
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list