[llvm] [Pipeliner] Fix Phi node dependency calculation (PR #160056)

[via llvm-commits]

github-actions[bot] wrote:

<!--LLVM CODE FORMAT COMMENT: {clang-format}-->


:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code. :warning:

<details>
<summary>
You can test this locally with the following command:
</summary>

``````````bash
git-clang-format --diff origin/main HEAD --extensions cpp -- llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachinePipeliner.cpp
``````````

:warning:
The reproduction instructions above might return results for more than one PR
in a stack if you are using a stacked PR workflow. You can limit the results by
changing `origin/main` to the base branch/commit you want to compare against.
:warning:

</details>

<details>
<summary>
View the diff from clang-format here.
</summary>

``````````diff
diff --git a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachinePipeliner.cpp b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachinePipeliner.cpp
index 4b9e3fda4..3be2e48ee 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachinePipeliner.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachinePipeliner.cpp
@@ -3013,10 +3013,11 @@ bool SwingSchedulerDAG::mayOverlapInLaterIter(
   // having the same value, but not from the same parent instruction.
   // This is possible if the values come via phi nodes. So check
   // for the parents of phi nodes.
-  auto doesOverlap = [&](MachineInstr* MI, MachineInstr* MI2) {
+  auto doesOverlap = [&](MachineInstr *MI, MachineInstr *MI2) {
     if (MI->isPHI()) {
       for (auto MO : MI->operands()) {
-        if (!MO.isReg()) continue;
+        if (!MO.isReg())
+          continue;
         if (MI2 == MRI.getVRegDef(MO.getReg()))
           return true;
       }

``````````

</details>


https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/160056