[llvm] [TargetLowering] Prefer selects over usubo if we do the same for ucmp (PR #159889)

[via llvm-commits]

github-actions[bot] wrote:

<!--LLVM CODE FORMAT COMMENT: {clang-format}-->


:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code. :warning:

<details>
<summary>
You can test this locally with the following command:
</summary>

``````````bash
git-clang-format --diff origin/main HEAD --extensions cpp -- llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/TargetLowering.cpp
``````````

:warning:
The reproduction instructions above might return results for more than one PR
in a stack if you are using a stacked PR workflow. You can limit the results by
changing `origin/main` to the base branch/commit you want to compare against.
:warning:

</details>

<details>
<summary>
View the diff from clang-format here.
</summary>

``````````diff
diff --git a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/TargetLowering.cpp b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/TargetLowering.cpp
index cb33a0051..79d1780a8 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/TargetLowering.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/TargetLowering.cpp
@@ -9779,7 +9779,8 @@ SDValue TargetLowering::expandABD(SDNode *N, SelectionDAG &DAG) const {
   // flag if the (scalar) type is illegal as this is more likely to legalize
   // cleanly:
   // abdu(lhs, rhs) -> sub(xor(sub(lhs, rhs), uof(lhs, rhs)), uof(lhs, rhs))
-  if (!IsSigned && VT.isScalarInteger() && !isTypeLegal(VT) && !shouldExpandCmpUsingSelects(VT)) {
+  if (!IsSigned && VT.isScalarInteger() && !isTypeLegal(VT) &&
+      !shouldExpandCmpUsingSelects(VT)) {
     SDValue USubO =
         DAG.getNode(ISD::USUBO, dl, DAG.getVTList(VT, MVT::i1), {LHS, RHS});
     SDValue Cmp = DAG.getNode(ISD::SIGN_EXTEND, dl, VT, USubO.getValue(1));

``````````

</details>


https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/159889