[llvm] [PowerPC] Implement a more efficient memcmp in cases where the length is known. (PR #158657)
    Lei Huang via llvm-commits 
    llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
       
    Wed Sep 17 09:45:35 PDT 2025
    
    
  
================
@@ -15556,6 +15556,63 @@ SDValue PPCTargetLowering::combineSetCC(SDNode *N,
       SDValue Add = DAG.getNode(ISD::ADD, DL, OpVT, LHS, RHS.getOperand(1));
       return DAG.getSetCC(DL, VT, Add, DAG.getConstant(0, DL, OpVT), CC);
     }
+    if (Subtarget.hasVSX()) {
+      if (LHS.getOpcode() == ISD::LOAD && RHS.getOpcode() == ISD::LOAD &&
+          LHS.hasOneUse() && RHS.hasOneUse() &&
+          LHS.getValueType() == MVT::i128 && RHS.getValueType() == MVT::i128) {
+        SDLoc DL(N);
+        SelectionDAG &DAG = DCI.DAG;
+        auto *LA = dyn_cast<LoadSDNode>(LHS);
+        auto *LB = dyn_cast<LoadSDNode>(RHS);
+        if (!LA || !LB)
+          return SDValue();
+
+        // If either memory operation (LA or LB) is volatile, do not perform any
+        // optimization or transformation. Volatile operations must be preserved
+        // as written to ensure correct program behavior, so we return an empty
+        // SDValue to indicate no action.
+        if (LA->isVolatile() || LB->isVolatile())
+          return SDValue();
+
+        // Only combine loads if both use the unindexed addressing mode.
+        // PowerPC AltiVec/VMX does not support vector loads or stores with
+        // pre/post-increment addressing. Indexed modes may imply implicit
+        // pointer updates, which are not compatible with AltiVec vector
+        // instructions.
+        if (LA->getAddressingMode() != ISD::UNINDEXED ||
+            LB->getAddressingMode() != ISD::UNINDEXED)
+          return SDValue();
+
+        // Only combine loads if both are non-extending loads
+        // (ISD::NON_EXTLOAD). Extending loads (such as ISD::ZEXTLOAD or
+        // ISD::SEXTLOAD) perform zero or sign extension, which may change the
+        // loaded value's semantics and are not compatible with vector loads.
+        if (LA->getExtensionType() != ISD::NON_EXTLOAD ||
+            LB->getExtensionType() != ISD::NON_EXTLOAD)
+          return SDValue();
+        // Build new v16i8 loads using the same chain/base/MMO (no extra memory
+        // op).
+        SDValue LHSVec = DAG.getLoad(MVT::v16i8, DL, LA->getChain(),
+                                     LA->getBasePtr(), LA->getMemOperand());
+        SDValue RHSVec = DAG.getLoad(MVT::v16i8, DL, LB->getChain(),
+                                     LB->getBasePtr(), LB->getMemOperand());
+
+        SDValue IntrID =
+            DAG.getTargetConstant(Intrinsic::ppc_altivec_vcmpequb_p, DL,
+                                  Subtarget.isPPC64() ? MVT::i64 : MVT::i32);
+        SDValue CRSel =
+            DAG.getConstant(2, DL, MVT::i32); // which CR6 predicate field
+        SDValue Ops[] = {IntrID, CRSel, LHSVec, RHSVec};
+        SDValue PredResult =
+            DAG.getNode(ISD::INTRINSIC_WO_CHAIN, DL, MVT::i32, Ops);
----------------
lei137 wrote:
`Ops[]` is not needed, just inine it to the call?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/158657
    
    
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list