[llvm] [LV] Don't ignore invariant stores when costing (PR #158682)

[Florian Hahn via llvm-commits]

https://github.com/fhahn commented:

Hmm, does that mean we now compute the cost of the scalar store for VF = 1, whereas before we would not compute it?

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/158682