[llvm] [InstCombine] Generalize `foldAndOrOfICmpsUsingRanges` to handle more cases. (PR #158498)
Andreas Jonson via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Sep 15 10:11:54 PDT 2025
================
@@ -1320,74 +1320,49 @@ static Value *foldAndOrOfICmpsWithConstEq(ICmpInst *Cmp0, ICmpInst *Cmp1,
Value *InstCombinerImpl::foldAndOrOfICmpsUsingRanges(ICmpInst *ICmp1,
ICmpInst *ICmp2,
bool IsAnd) {
- CmpPredicate Pred1, Pred2;
- Value *V1, *V2;
- const APInt *C1, *C2;
- if (!match(ICmp1, m_ICmp(Pred1, m_Value(V1), m_APInt(C1))) ||
- !match(ICmp2, m_ICmp(Pred2, m_Value(V2), m_APInt(C2))))
- return nullptr;
-
- // Look through add of a constant offset on V1, V2, or both operands. This
- // allows us to interpret the V + C' < C'' range idiom into a proper range.
- const APInt *Offset1 = nullptr, *Offset2 = nullptr;
- if (V1 != V2) {
- Value *X;
- if (match(V1, m_Add(m_Value(X), m_APInt(Offset1))))
- V1 = X;
- if (match(V2, m_Add(m_Value(X), m_APInt(Offset2))))
- V2 = X;
- }
-
- // Look through and with a negative power of 2 mask on V1 or V2. This
- // detects idioms of the form `(x == A) || ((x & Mask) == A + 1)` where A + 1
- // is aligned to the mask and A + 1 >= |Mask|. This pattern corresponds to a
- // contiguous range check, which can be folded into an addition and compare.
- // The same applies for `(x != A) && ((x & Mask) != A + 1)`.
- auto AreContiguousRangePredicates = [](CmpPredicate Pred1, CmpPredicate Pred2,
- bool IsAnd) {
- if (IsAnd)
- return Pred1 == ICmpInst::ICMP_NE && Pred2 == ICmpInst::ICMP_NE;
- return Pred1 == ICmpInst::ICMP_EQ && Pred2 == ICmpInst::ICMP_EQ;
- };
- const APInt *Mask1 = nullptr, *Mask2 = nullptr;
- bool MatchedAnd1 = false, MatchedAnd2 = false;
- if (V1 != V2 && AreContiguousRangePredicates(Pred1, Pred2, IsAnd)) {
+ auto MatchRangeCheck =
+ [](ICmpInst *ICmp) -> std::optional<std::pair<Value *, ConstantRange>> {
+ const APInt *C;
+ if (!match(ICmp->getOperand(1), m_APInt(C)))
+ return std::nullopt;
+ Value *LHS = ICmp->getOperand(0);
+ CmpPredicate Pred = ICmp->getPredicate();
Value *X;
- if (match(V1, m_OneUse(m_And(m_Value(X), m_NegatedPower2(Mask1)))) &&
- C1->getBitWidth() == C2->getBitWidth() && *C1 == *C2 + 1 &&
- C1->uge(Mask1->abs()) && C1->isPowerOf2()) {
- MatchedAnd1 = true;
- V1 = X;
- }
- if (match(V2, m_OneUse(m_And(m_Value(X), m_NegatedPower2(Mask2)))) &&
- C1->getBitWidth() == C2->getBitWidth() && *C2 == *C1 + 1 &&
- C2->uge(Mask2->abs()) && C2->isPowerOf2()) {
- MatchedAnd2 = true;
- V2 = X;
+ // Match (x & NegPow2) ==/!= C
+ const APInt *Mask;
+ if (ICmpInst::isEquality(Pred) &&
+ match(LHS, m_OneUse(m_And(m_Value(X), m_NegatedPower2(Mask)))) &&
----------------
andjo403 wrote:
do we need the one use check here? there is non for the add below
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/158498
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list