[llvm] [ADT] Improve a comment in APInt.h (PR #156390)

[via llvm-commits]

llvmbot wrote:


<!--LLVM PR SUMMARY COMMENT-->

@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-adt

Author: Kazu Hirata (kazutakahirata)

<details>
<summary>Changes</summary>

We don't have to remove this constructor if we are worried about
accidental binding.  We can use "= delete" instead.  Also, this patch
replaces "captured by" with "bound to" as that is more precise
terminology than "captured by".


---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/156390.diff


1 Files Affected:

- (modified) llvm/include/llvm/ADT/APInt.h (+3-3) 


``````````diff
diff --git a/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/APInt.h b/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/APInt.h
index e68dc8bd14d96..9fa98ad4ddde1 100644
--- a/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/APInt.h
+++ b/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/APInt.h
@@ -151,9 +151,9 @@ class [[nodiscard]] APInt {
   /// deprecated because this constructor is prone to ambiguity with the
   /// APInt(unsigned, uint64_t, bool) constructor.
   ///
-  /// If this overload is ever deleted, care should be taken to prevent calls
-  /// from being incorrectly captured by the APInt(unsigned, uint64_t, bool)
-  /// constructor.
+  /// Once all uses of this constructor are migrated to other constructors,
+  /// consider marking this overload ""= delete" to prevent calls from being
+  /// incorrectly bound to the APInt(unsigned, uint64_t, bool) constructor.
   LLVM_ABI APInt(unsigned numBits, unsigned numWords, const uint64_t bigVal[]);
 
   /// Construct an APInt from a string representation.

``````````

</details>


https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/156390