[llvm] 4159fd8 - [OMPIRBuilder] Avoid crash in BasicBlock::splice. (#154987)
via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Aug 29 08:56:30 PDT 2025
Author: Abid Qadeer
Date: 2025-08-29T16:56:26+01:00
New Revision: 4159fd819a89cb18e03a91576372ae257ee5fbc7
URL: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/4159fd819a89cb18e03a91576372ae257ee5fbc7
DIFF: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/4159fd819a89cb18e03a91576372ae257ee5fbc7.diff
LOG: [OMPIRBuilder] Avoid crash in BasicBlock::splice. (#154987)
Calling `BasicBlock::splice` in `spliceBB` when both `Old` and `New` are
empty is a `nop` currently but it can cause a crash once debug records
are used instead of debug intrinsics. This PR makes the call conditional
on at least one of `Old` or `New` being non-empty.
Consider the following mlir:
```
omp.target map_entries() {
llvm.intr.dbg.declare ...
llvm.intr.dbg.declare ...
omp.teams ...
...
}
```
Current code would translate llvm.intr Ops to llvm intrinsics. Old is
the BasicBlock where they were get inserted and it will have 2 llvm
debug intrinsics by the time the implementation of `omp.teams` starts.
This implementation creates many BasicBlocks by calling `splitBB`. The
`New` is the just created BasicBlock which is empty.
In the new scheme (using debug records), there will be no instruction in
the `Old` BB after llvm.intr Ops get translated but just 2 trailing
debug records. So both `Old` and `New` are empty. When control reaches
`BasicBlock::splice`, it calls `spliceDebugInfoEmptyBlock`. This
function expects that in this case (`Src` is empty but has trailing
debug records), the `ToIt` is valid and it can call `adoptDbgRecords` on
it. This assumption is not true in this case as `New` is empty and
`ToIt` is pointing to end(). The fix is to only call
`BasicBlock::splice` when at least of `Old` or `New` is not empty.
Added:
Modified:
llvm/lib/Frontend/OpenMP/OMPIRBuilder.cpp
llvm/unittests/Frontend/OpenMPIRBuilderTest.cpp
Removed:
################################################################################
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Frontend/OpenMP/OMPIRBuilder.cpp b/llvm/lib/Frontend/OpenMP/OMPIRBuilder.cpp
index c0e956840f989..e740c2819fec9 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Frontend/OpenMP/OMPIRBuilder.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Frontend/OpenMP/OMPIRBuilder.cpp
@@ -307,7 +307,19 @@ void llvm::spliceBB(IRBuilderBase::InsertPoint IP, BasicBlock *New,
// Move instructions to new block.
BasicBlock *Old = IP.getBlock();
- New->splice(New->begin(), Old, IP.getPoint(), Old->end());
+ // If the `Old` block is empty then there are no instructions to move. But in
+ // the new debug scheme, it could have trailing debug records which will be
+ // moved to `New` in `spliceDebugInfoEmptyBlock`. We dont want that for 2
+ // reasons:
+ // 1. If `New` is also empty, `BasicBlock::splice` crashes.
+ // 2. Even if `New` is not empty, the rationale to move those records to `New`
+ // (in `spliceDebugInfoEmptyBlock`) does not apply here. That function
+ // assumes that `Old` is optimized out and is going away. This is not the case
+ // here. The `Old` block is still being used e.g. a branch instruction is
+ // added to it later in this function.
+ // So we call `BasicBlock::splice` only when `Old` is not empty.
+ if (!Old->empty())
+ New->splice(New->begin(), Old, IP.getPoint(), Old->end());
if (CreateBranch) {
auto *NewBr = BranchInst::Create(New, Old);
diff --git a/llvm/unittests/Frontend/OpenMPIRBuilderTest.cpp b/llvm/unittests/Frontend/OpenMPIRBuilderTest.cpp
index b7a060bb3563d..c13570dc803b3 100644
--- a/llvm/unittests/Frontend/OpenMPIRBuilderTest.cpp
+++ b/llvm/unittests/Frontend/OpenMPIRBuilderTest.cpp
@@ -7852,4 +7852,28 @@ TEST_F(OpenMPIRBuilderTest, splitBB) {
EXPECT_TRUE(DL == AllocaBB->getTerminator()->getStableDebugLoc());
}
+TEST_F(OpenMPIRBuilderTest, spliceBBWithEmptyBB) {
+ OpenMPIRBuilder OMPBuilder(*M);
+ OMPBuilder.Config.IsTargetDevice = false;
+ OMPBuilder.initialize();
+ F->setName("func");
+ IRBuilder<> Builder(BB);
+
+ // Test calling spliceBB with an empty Block (but having trailing debug
+ // records).
+ DIBuilder DIB(*M);
+ DISubprogram *SP = F->getSubprogram();
+ DIType *VoidPtrTy =
+ DIB.createQualifiedType(dwarf::DW_TAG_pointer_type, nullptr);
+ DILocalVariable *Var = DIB.createParameterVariable(
+ SP, "test", /*ArgNo*/ 1, SP->getFile(), /*LineNo=*/0, VoidPtrTy);
+ DIB.insertDeclare(F->getArg(0), Var, DIB.createExpression(), DL,
+ Builder.GetInsertPoint());
+ BasicBlock *New = BasicBlock::Create(Ctx, "", F);
+ spliceBB(Builder.saveIP(), New, true, DL);
+ Instruction *Terminator = BB->getTerminator();
+ EXPECT_NE(Terminator, nullptr);
+ EXPECT_FALSE(Terminator->getDbgRecordRange().empty());
+}
+
} // namespace
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list