[llvm] [llvm] Fix fabs simplification (PR #152825)
via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Aug 8 21:01:50 PDT 2025
llvmbot wrote:
<!--LLVM PR SUMMARY COMMENT-->
@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-analysis
Author: Oliver Hunt (ojhunt)
<details>
<summary>Changes</summary>
The existing code hits the std::optional<bool> is of comparing to a bool being "correct" for the std::optional and the intended comparison.
This corrects the comparison while reinforcing the idea that we need some way to diagnose this.
Fixes #<!-- -->152824
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/152825.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) llvm/lib/Analysis/InstructionSimplify.cpp (+1-1)
``````````diff
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Analysis/InstructionSimplify.cpp b/llvm/lib/Analysis/InstructionSimplify.cpp
index 5907e21065331..afe6275d0426e 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Analysis/InstructionSimplify.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Analysis/InstructionSimplify.cpp
@@ -6304,7 +6304,7 @@ static Value *simplifyUnaryIntrinsic(Function *F, Value *Op0,
Value *X;
switch (IID) {
case Intrinsic::fabs:
- if (computeKnownFPSignBit(Op0, Q) == false)
+ if (*computeKnownFPSignBit(Op0, Q) == false)
return Op0;
break;
case Intrinsic::bswap:
``````````
</details>
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/152825
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list