[llvm] [InstCombine] optimize unnecessary sext instruction with add + cmp (PR #152291)
Nikita Popov via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Aug 6 06:36:16 PDT 2025
================
@@ -6381,6 +6381,36 @@ Instruction *InstCombinerImpl::foldICmpWithZextOrSext(ICmpInst &ICmp) {
return new ICmpInst(CmpInst::ICMP_SLT, X, Constant::getNullValue(SrcTy));
}
+Instruction *InstCombinerImpl::foldICmpWithSextAndAdd(ICmpInst &ICmp) {
+ Value *X;
+ ConstantInt *Y, *Z;
+ // Match the pattern: icmp ult (add (sext X), Y), Z
+ // where X is a value, Y and Z are integer constants
+ // icmp ult (add(sext(X), Y)), Z -> icmp ult (add(X, Y)), Z
+ if (match(&ICmp, m_SpecificICmp(CmpInst::ICMP_ULT,
+ m_Add(m_SExt(m_Value(X)), m_ConstantInt(Y)),
----------------
nikic wrote:
m_ConstantInt -> m_APInt and then work on APInt instead of int64_t returned by getSExtValue().
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/152291
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list