[llvm] [DA][NFC] clang-format DependenceAnalysis (PR #151505)

[Ryotaro Kasuga via llvm-commits]

================
@@ -1270,9 +1231,9 @@ bool DependenceInfo::strongSIVtest(const SCEV *Coeff, const SCEV *SrcConst,
     LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "\t    UpperBound = " << *UpperBound);
     LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << ", " << *UpperBound->getType() << "\n");
     const SCEV *AbsDelta =
-      SE->isKnownNonNegative(Delta) ? Delta : SE->getNegativeSCEV(Delta);
+        SE->isKnownNonNegative(Delta) ? Delta : SE->getNegativeSCEV(Delta);
----------------
kasuga-fj wrote:

Not the topic of this PR, but this logic is clearly incorrect... (`!isKnownNonNegative(Delta)` doesn't imply that `Delta` is negative)

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/151505