[llvm] [LAA] Pre-commit tests exercising different types (PR #151091)
Ramkumar Ramachandra via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Jul 28 23:58:14 PDT 2025
https://github.com/artagnon created https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/151091
Pre-commit tests exercising different types of source/sink in depend_diff_types.ll, in preparation to weaken the HasSameSize check in LoopAccessAnalysis.
>From 74d974fa233c69d61d5f9357ed6a5cfdff67ff64 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ramkumar Ramachandra <ramkumar.ramachandra at codasip.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2025 07:54:08 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] [LAA] Pre-commit tests exercising different types
Pre-commit tests exercising different types of source/sink in
depend_diff_types.ll, in preparation to weaken the HasSameSize check in
LoopAccessAnalysis.
---
.../LoopAccessAnalysis/depend_diff_types.ll | 217 ++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 217 insertions(+)
diff --git a/llvm/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/depend_diff_types.ll b/llvm/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/depend_diff_types.ll
index 1bf80489b1ea0..892cc916b2aa2 100644
--- a/llvm/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/depend_diff_types.ll
+++ b/llvm/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/depend_diff_types.ll
@@ -262,3 +262,220 @@ loop:
exit:
ret void
}
+
+define void @different_type_sizes_strided_accesses_independent(ptr %dst) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: 'different_type_sizes_strided_accesses_independent'
+; CHECK-NEXT: loop:
+; CHECK-NEXT: Report: unsafe dependent memory operations in loop. Use #pragma clang loop distribute(enable) to allow loop distribution to attempt to isolate the offending operations into a separate loop
+; CHECK-NEXT: Unknown data dependence.
+; CHECK-NEXT: Dependences:
+; CHECK-NEXT: Unknown:
+; CHECK-NEXT: store i16 0, ptr %gep.iv, align 2 ->
+; CHECK-NEXT: store i8 1, ptr %gep.10.iv, align 1
+; CHECK-EMPTY:
+; CHECK-NEXT: Run-time memory checks:
+; CHECK-NEXT: Grouped accesses:
+; CHECK-EMPTY:
+; CHECK-NEXT: Non vectorizable stores to invariant address were not found in loop.
+; CHECK-NEXT: SCEV assumptions:
+; CHECK-EMPTY:
+; CHECK-NEXT: Expressions re-written:
+;
+entry:
+ %gep.10 = getelementptr nuw i8, ptr %dst, i64 10
+ br label %loop
+
+loop:
+ %iv = phi i64 [ 0, %entry ], [ %iv.next, %loop ]
+ %gep.iv = getelementptr i8, ptr %dst, i64 %iv
+ store i16 0, ptr %gep.iv
+ %gep.10.iv = getelementptr i8, ptr %gep.10, i64 %iv
+ store i8 1, ptr %gep.10.iv
+ %iv.next = add i64 %iv, 8
+ %ec = icmp eq i64 %iv.next, 64
+ br i1 %ec, label %exit, label %loop
+
+exit:
+ ret void
+}
+
+define void @different_type_sizes_strided_accesses_dependent(ptr %dst) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: 'different_type_sizes_strided_accesses_dependent'
+; CHECK-NEXT: loop:
+; CHECK-NEXT: Report: unsafe dependent memory operations in loop. Use #pragma clang loop distribute(enable) to allow loop distribution to attempt to isolate the offending operations into a separate loop
+; CHECK-NEXT: Unknown data dependence.
+; CHECK-NEXT: Dependences:
+; CHECK-NEXT: Unknown:
+; CHECK-NEXT: store i64 0, ptr %gep.iv, align 4 ->
+; CHECK-NEXT: store i8 1, ptr %gep.10.iv, align 1
+; CHECK-EMPTY:
+; CHECK-NEXT: Run-time memory checks:
+; CHECK-NEXT: Grouped accesses:
+; CHECK-EMPTY:
+; CHECK-NEXT: Non vectorizable stores to invariant address were not found in loop.
+; CHECK-NEXT: SCEV assumptions:
+; CHECK-EMPTY:
+; CHECK-NEXT: Expressions re-written:
+;
+entry:
+ %gep.10 = getelementptr nuw i8, ptr %dst, i64 10
+ br label %loop
+
+loop:
+ %iv = phi i64 [ 0, %entry ], [ %iv.next, %loop ]
+ %gep.iv = getelementptr i8, ptr %dst, i64 %iv
+ store i64 0, ptr %gep.iv
+ %gep.10.iv = getelementptr i8, ptr %gep.10, i64 %iv
+ store i8 1, ptr %gep.10.iv
+ %iv.next = add i64 %iv, 8
+ %ec = icmp eq i64 %iv.next, 64
+ br i1 %ec, label %exit, label %loop
+
+exit:
+ ret void
+}
+
+define void @different_type_sizes_source_size_backwardvectorizible(ptr %dst) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: 'different_type_sizes_source_size_backwardvectorizible'
+; CHECK-NEXT: loop:
+; CHECK-NEXT: Report: unsafe dependent memory operations in loop. Use #pragma clang loop distribute(enable) to allow loop distribution to attempt to isolate the offending operations into a separate loop
+; CHECK-NEXT: Unknown data dependence.
+; CHECK-NEXT: Dependences:
+; CHECK-NEXT: Unknown:
+; CHECK-NEXT: store i16 0, ptr %gep.iv, align 2 ->
+; CHECK-NEXT: store i32 1, ptr %gep.10.iv, align 4
+; CHECK-EMPTY:
+; CHECK-NEXT: Run-time memory checks:
+; CHECK-NEXT: Grouped accesses:
+; CHECK-EMPTY:
+; CHECK-NEXT: Non vectorizable stores to invariant address were not found in loop.
+; CHECK-NEXT: SCEV assumptions:
+; CHECK-EMPTY:
+; CHECK-NEXT: Expressions re-written:
+;
+entry:
+ %gep.10 = getelementptr nuw i8, ptr %dst, i64 10
+ br label %loop
+
+loop:
+ %iv = phi i64 [ 0, %entry ], [ %iv.next, %loop ]
+ %gep.iv = getelementptr i8, ptr %dst, i64 %iv
+ store i16 0, ptr %gep.iv
+ %gep.10.iv = getelementptr i8, ptr %gep.10, i64 %iv
+ store i32 1, ptr %gep.10.iv
+ %iv.next = add i64 %iv, 8
+ %ec = icmp eq i64 %iv.next, 64
+ br i1 %ec, label %exit, label %loop
+
+exit:
+ ret void
+}
+
+define void @different_type_sizes_forward(ptr %dst) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: 'different_type_sizes_forward'
+; CHECK-NEXT: loop:
+; CHECK-NEXT: Memory dependences are safe
+; CHECK-NEXT: Dependences:
+; CHECK-NEXT: Forward:
+; CHECK-NEXT: store i32 0, ptr %gep.10.iv, align 4 ->
+; CHECK-NEXT: store i16 1, ptr %gep.iv, align 2
+; CHECK-EMPTY:
+; CHECK-NEXT: Run-time memory checks:
+; CHECK-NEXT: Grouped accesses:
+; CHECK-EMPTY:
+; CHECK-NEXT: Non vectorizable stores to invariant address were not found in loop.
+; CHECK-NEXT: SCEV assumptions:
+; CHECK-EMPTY:
+; CHECK-NEXT: Expressions re-written:
+;
+entry:
+ %gep.10 = getelementptr nuw i8, ptr %dst, i64 10
+ br label %loop
+
+loop:
+ %iv = phi i64 [ 0, %entry ], [ %iv.next, %loop ]
+ %gep.10.iv = getelementptr i8, ptr %gep.10, i64 %iv
+ store i32 0, ptr %gep.10.iv
+ %gep.iv = getelementptr i8, ptr %dst, i64 %iv
+ store i16 1, ptr %gep.iv
+ %iv.next = add i64 %iv, 8
+ %ec = icmp eq i64 %iv.next, 64
+ br i1 %ec, label %exit, label %loop
+
+exit:
+ ret void
+}
+
+define void @different_type_sizes_store_size_cannot_prevent_forwarding(ptr %A, ptr noalias %B) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: 'different_type_sizes_store_size_cannot_prevent_forwarding'
+; CHECK-NEXT: loop:
+; CHECK-NEXT: Report: unsafe dependent memory operations in loop. Use #pragma clang loop distribute(enable) to allow loop distribution to attempt to isolate the offending operations into a separate loop
+; CHECK-NEXT: Forward loop carried data dependence that prevents store-to-load forwarding.
+; CHECK-NEXT: Dependences:
+; CHECK-NEXT: ForwardButPreventsForwarding:
+; CHECK-NEXT: store i32 0, ptr %gep.A, align 4 ->
+; CHECK-NEXT: %l = load i16, ptr %gep.A.1, align 2
+; CHECK-EMPTY:
+; CHECK-NEXT: Run-time memory checks:
+; CHECK-NEXT: Grouped accesses:
+; CHECK-EMPTY:
+; CHECK-NEXT: Non vectorizable stores to invariant address were not found in loop.
+; CHECK-NEXT: SCEV assumptions:
+; CHECK-EMPTY:
+; CHECK-NEXT: Expressions re-written:
+;
+entry:
+ %A.1 = getelementptr i32, ptr %A, i64 1
+ br label %loop
+
+loop:
+ %iv = phi i64 [ 1022, %entry ], [ %iv.next, %loop ]
+ %gep.A = getelementptr inbounds i32, ptr %A, i64 %iv
+ store i32 0, ptr %gep.A
+ %gep.A.1 = getelementptr i32, ptr %A.1, i64 %iv
+ %l = load i16, ptr %gep.A.1
+ store i16 %l, ptr %B
+ %iv.next = add nsw i64 %iv, -1
+ %cmp = icmp eq i64 %iv, 0
+ br i1 %cmp, label %exit, label %loop
+
+exit:
+ ret void
+}
+
+define void @different_type_sizes_load_size_prevents_forwarding(ptr %A, ptr noalias %B) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: 'different_type_sizes_load_size_prevents_forwarding'
+; CHECK-NEXT: loop:
+; CHECK-NEXT: Report: unsafe dependent memory operations in loop. Use #pragma clang loop distribute(enable) to allow loop distribution to attempt to isolate the offending operations into a separate loop
+; CHECK-NEXT: Forward loop carried data dependence that prevents store-to-load forwarding.
+; CHECK-NEXT: Dependences:
+; CHECK-NEXT: ForwardButPreventsForwarding:
+; CHECK-NEXT: store i16 0, ptr %gep.A, align 2 ->
+; CHECK-NEXT: %l = load i32, ptr %gep.A.1, align 4
+; CHECK-EMPTY:
+; CHECK-NEXT: Run-time memory checks:
+; CHECK-NEXT: Grouped accesses:
+; CHECK-EMPTY:
+; CHECK-NEXT: Non vectorizable stores to invariant address were not found in loop.
+; CHECK-NEXT: SCEV assumptions:
+; CHECK-EMPTY:
+; CHECK-NEXT: Expressions re-written:
+;
+entry:
+ %A.1 = getelementptr i32, ptr %A, i64 1
+ br label %loop
+
+loop:
+ %iv = phi i64 [ 1022, %entry ], [ %iv.next, %loop ]
+ %gep.A = getelementptr inbounds i32, ptr %A, i64 %iv
+ store i16 0, ptr %gep.A
+ %gep.A.1 = getelementptr i32, ptr %A.1, i64 %iv
+ %l = load i32, ptr %gep.A.1
+ store i32 %l, ptr %B
+ %iv.next = add nsw i64 %iv, -1
+ %cmp = icmp eq i64 %iv, 0
+ br i1 %cmp, label %exit, label %loop
+
+exit:
+ ret void
+}
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list