[llvm] [DAG] optimize llvm.ucmp for 1-bit inputs to return subtraction of operands (PR #150058)
Craig Topper via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Jul 22 10:21:19 PDT 2025
================
@@ -10942,6 +10942,10 @@ SDValue TargetLowering::expandCMP(SDNode *Node, SelectionDAG &DAG) const {
SDValue IsLT = DAG.getSetCC(dl, BoolVT, LHS, RHS, LTPredicate);
SDValue IsGT = DAG.getSetCC(dl, BoolVT, LHS, RHS, GTPredicate);
+ if (isa<VTSDNode>(RHS->getOperand(1)) &&
----------------
topperc wrote:
You can't access operand 1 without confirming the opcode of RHS first to know that operand 1 exists.
The only opcode that has a VTSDNode operand is SIGN_EXTEND_INREG, but your test uses `zeroext` so I don't know where a SIGN_EXTEND_INREG would come from.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150058
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list