[llvm] [ADT] Use a range-based for loop instead of llvm::for_each (NFC) (PR #149542)

[via llvm-commits]

llvmbot wrote:


<!--LLVM PR SUMMARY COMMENT-->

@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-adt

Author: Kazu Hirata (kazutakahirata)

<details>
<summary>Changes</summary>

LLVM Coding Standards discourages llvm::for_each unless we already
have a callable.


---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149542.diff


1 Files Affected:

- (modified) llvm/include/llvm/ADT/CombinationGenerator.h (+1-2) 


``````````diff
diff --git a/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/CombinationGenerator.h b/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/CombinationGenerator.h
index 6100aa9812293..bbdbd9bfa1be3 100644
--- a/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/CombinationGenerator.h
+++ b/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/CombinationGenerator.h
@@ -118,10 +118,9 @@ class CombinationGenerator {
       : VariablesChoices(VariablesChoices_) {
 #ifndef NDEBUG
     assert(!VariablesChoices.empty() && "There should be some variables.");
-    llvm::for_each(VariablesChoices, [](ArrayRef<choice_type> VariableChoices) {
+    for (ArrayRef<choice_type> VariableChoices : VariablesChoices)
       assert(!VariableChoices.empty() &&
              "There must always be some choice, at least a placeholder one.");
-    });
 #endif
   }
 

``````````

</details>


https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149542