[llvm] [LoopVectorize] Generate wide active lane masks (PR #147535)
David Sherwood via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Jul 14 06:19:55 PDT 2025
================
@@ -1432,20 +1433,93 @@ static bool isConditionTrueViaVFAndUF(VPValue *Cond, VPlan &Plan,
return SE.isKnownPredicate(CmpInst::ICMP_EQ, TripCount, C);
}
+static void extractFromWideActiveLaneMask(VPlan &Plan, ElementCount VF,
+ unsigned UF) {
+ VPRegionBlock *VectorRegion = Plan.getVectorLoopRegion();
+ auto *Header = cast<VPBasicBlock>(VectorRegion->getEntry());
+ VPBasicBlock *ExitingVPBB = VectorRegion->getExitingBasicBlock();
+ auto *Term = &ExitingVPBB->back();
+
+ VPCanonicalIVPHIRecipe *CanonicalIV = Plan.getCanonicalIV();
+ LLVMContext &Ctx = CanonicalIV->getScalarType()->getContext();
+ using namespace llvm::VPlanPatternMatch;
+
+ auto extractFromALM = [&](VPInstruction *ALM, VPInstruction *InsBefore,
+ SmallVectorImpl<VPValue *> &Extracts) {
+ VPBuilder Builder(InsBefore);
+ DebugLoc DL = ALM->getDebugLoc();
+ for (unsigned Part = 0; Part < UF; ++Part) {
+ SmallVector<VPValue *> Ops;
+ Ops.append({ALM, Plan.getOrAddLiveIn(
+ ConstantInt::get(IntegerType::getInt64Ty(Ctx),
+ VF.getKnownMinValue() * Part))});
+ Extracts.push_back(
+ Builder.createNaryOp(VPInstruction::ExtractSubvector, Ops, DL));
+ }
+ };
+
+ // Create a list of each active lane mask phi, ordered by unroll part.
+ SmallVector<VPActiveLaneMaskPHIRecipe *> Phis(UF, nullptr);
+ for (VPRecipeBase &R : Header->phis())
+ if (auto *Phi = dyn_cast<VPActiveLaneMaskPHIRecipe>(&R))
+ Phis[Phi->getUnrollPart()] = Phi;
+
+ assert(all_of(Phis, [](VPActiveLaneMaskPHIRecipe *Phi) { return Phi; }) &&
+ "Expected one VPActiveLaneMaskPHIRecipe for each unroll part");
+
+ // When using wide lane masks, the return type of the get.active.lane.mask
+ // intrinsic is VF x UF (second operand).
+ VPValue *ALMMultiplier =
+ Plan.getOrAddLiveIn(ConstantInt::get(IntegerType::getInt64Ty(Ctx), UF));
+ cast<VPInstruction>(Phis[0]->getStartValue())->setOperand(2, ALMMultiplier);
----------------
david-arm wrote:
Is it worth asserting that the start value and backedge values are ActiveLaneMask instructions?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147535
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list