[llvm] [LangRef] Document the difference between `<abi>` and `<pref>` (PR #147929)
Nikita Popov via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Jul 10 08:11:09 PDT 2025
================
@@ -3240,12 +3240,15 @@ as follows:
as :ref:`Non-Integral Pointer Type <nointptrtype>` s. The ``0``
address space cannot be specified as non-integral.
+``<abi>`` provides a minimum allowed alignment for a type, and
----------------
nikic wrote:
"minimum allowed alignment" isn't really accurate in that you *can* use lower alignments, they'll just be considered unaligned.
The ABI alignment is used in various places:
* The default alignment for loads and stores when no explicit alignment is given in textual IR.
* The alignment used to compute struct layout.
* The alignment used to compute allocation sizes and thus getelementptr offsets.
* The alignment below which accesses are considered underaligned.
* ...
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147929
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list