[llvm] [HashRecognize] Rewrite arePHIsIntertwined (PR #144878)
Piotr Fusik via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Jul 1 04:47:38 PDT 2025
================
@@ -497,42 +497,46 @@ CRCTable HashRecognize::genSarwateTable(const APInt &GenPoly,
return Table;
}
-/// Checks if \p Reference is reachable from \p Needle on the use-def chain, and
-/// that there are no stray PHI nodes while digging the use-def chain. \p
-/// BOToMatch is a CRC peculiarity: at least one of the Users of Needle needs to
-/// match this OpCode, which is XOR for CRC.
-static bool arePHIsIntertwined(
- const PHINode *Needle, const PHINode *Reference, const Loop &L,
- Instruction::BinaryOps BOToMatch = Instruction::BinaryOpsEnd) {
- // Initialize the worklist with Users of the Needle.
- SmallVector<const Instruction *> Worklist;
- for (const User *U : Needle->users()) {
- if (auto *UI = dyn_cast<Instruction>(U))
- if (L.contains(UI))
- Worklist.push_back(UI);
- }
+/// Checks that \p L and \p R are used together in an XOR in the use-def chain
+/// of \p SI's condition, ignoring any casts. The purpose of this function is to
+/// ensure that LHSAux from the SimpleRecurrence is used correctly in the CRC
+/// computation. We cannot check the correctness of casts at this point, and
+/// rely on the KnownBits propagation to check correctness of the CRC
+/// computation.
+///
+/// In other words, it checks for the following pattern:
+///
+/// loop:
+/// %L = phi [_, %entry], [%L.next, %loop]
+/// %R = phi [_, %entry], [%R.next, %loop]
+/// ...
+/// %xor = xor (CastOrSelf %L), (CastOrSelf %R)
+///
+/// where %xor is in the use-def chain of \p SI's condition.
+static bool isConditionalOnXorOfPHIs(SelectInst *SI, const PHINode *P1,
+ const PHINode *P2, const Loop &L) {
+ SmallVector<Instruction *> Worklist;
- // BOToMatch is usually XOR for CRC.
- if (BOToMatch != Instruction::BinaryOpsEnd) {
- if (count_if(Worklist, [BOToMatch](const Instruction *I) {
- return I->getOpcode() == BOToMatch;
- }) != 1)
- return false;
- }
+ // matchConditionalRecurrence has already ensured that the SelectInst's
+ // condition is an Instruction.
+ Worklist.push_back(cast<Instruction>(SI->getCondition()));
while (!Worklist.empty()) {
- const Instruction *I = Worklist.pop_back_val();
+ Instruction *I = Worklist.pop_back_val();
----------------
pfusik wrote:
Let's keep this `const`. And for `Worklist` elements.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144878
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list