[llvm] [LoopInterchange] Require unordered load/store (PR #146143)
Ryotaro Kasuga via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Jun 30 02:16:09 PDT 2025
https://github.com/kasuga-fj commented:
Could you please add tests?
Also, IIUIC, `isSimple` imposes a strictly stronger condition than `isUnordered`. If the opposite were true (i.e., if DA required a stronger restriction than `isSimple`), this change would make perfectly sense to me. However, that is not the case here. So, it might be meaningful to call `isSimple` instead of `isUnordered` here (I feel like there's not a particularly strong reason, but I'm not entirely sure).
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/146143
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list