[llvm] [AArch64][CostModel] Lower cost of dupq (SVE2.1) (PR #144918)

[Gaëtan Bossu via llvm-commits]

================
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_analyze_test_checks.py UTC_ARGS: --version 5
+; RUN: opt -passes="print<cost-model>" -cost-kind=throughput 2>&1 -disable-output -mtriple=aarch64--linux-gnu -mattr=+sve2p1 < %s | FileCheck %s
+; RUN: opt -passes="print<cost-model>" -cost-kind=throughput 2>&1 -disable-output -mtriple=aarch64--linux-gnu -mattr=+sme2p1 -force-streaming < %s | FileCheck %s
+
+;; Broadcast indexed lane within 128b segments (dupq zd.t, zn.t[idx])
+define void @dup_within_each_segment() #0 {
+; CHECK-LABEL: 'dup_within_each_segment'
+; CHECK-NEXT:  Cost Model: Found an estimated cost of 1 for instruction: %dupq_b11 = shufflevector <32 x i8> poison, <32 x i8> poison, <32 x i32> <i32 11, i32 11, i32 11, i32 11, i32 11, i32 11, i32 11, i32 11, i32 11, i32 11, i32 11, i32 11, i32 11, i32 11, i32 11, i32 11, i32 27, i32 27, i32 27, i32 27, i32 27, i32 27, i32 27, i32 27, i32 27, i32 27, i32 27, i32 27, i32 27, i32 27, i32 27, i32 27>
+; CHECK-NEXT:  Cost Model: Found an estimated cost of 1 for instruction: %dupq_h2 = shufflevector <16 x i16> poison, <16 x i16> poison, <16 x i32> <i32 2, i32 2, i32 2, i32 2, i32 2, i32 2, i32 2, i32 2, i32 10, i32 10, i32 10, i32 10, i32 10, i32 10, i32 10, i32 10>
+; CHECK-NEXT:  Cost Model: Found an estimated cost of 1 for instruction: %dupq_s3 = shufflevector <8 x i32> poison, <8 x i32> poison, <8 x i32> <i32 3, i32 3, i32 3, i32 3, i32 7, i32 7, i32 7, i32 7>
+; CHECK-NEXT:  Cost Model: Found an estimated cost of 1 for instruction: %dupq_d0 = shufflevector <4 x i64> poison, <4 x i64> poison, <4 x i32> <i32 0, i32 0, i32 2, i32 2>
+; CHECK-NEXT:  Cost Model: Found an estimated cost of 2 for instruction: %dupq_512b_d1 = shufflevector <8 x i64> poison, <8 x i64> poison, <8 x i32> <i32 1, i32 1, i32 3, i32 3, i32 5, i32 5, i32 7, i32 7>
----------------
gbossu wrote:

Checking: I'm assuming this would have a cost of `1` with `vscale(4,4)`. Would it be worth to add another function to test that?

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144918