[llvm] 8e4fdff - [X86] Update tailcc-ssp.ll assertions using update_llc_test_checks.py (#143500)

via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Jun 12 02:48:16 PDT 2025


Author: Omair Javaid
Date: 2025-06-12T14:48:13+05:00
New Revision: 8e4fdff6f02161d878a63900abb35aaa32ff85e9

URL: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/8e4fdff6f02161d878a63900abb35aaa32ff85e9
DIFF: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/8e4fdff6f02161d878a63900abb35aaa32ff85e9.diff

LOG: [X86] Update tailcc-ssp.ll assertions using update_llc_test_checks.py (#143500)

The assertions in llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/tailcc-ssp.ll were outdated. The
initial comment indicated they were generated with
`utils/update_llc_test_checks.py UTC_ARGS: --version 5`, but this was
not accurate based on the file's content.

Running `utils/update_llc_test_checks.py` regenerated the assertions,
aligning them with the current `llc` output.
This commit ensures that the test's claimed behavior accurately reflects
the actual `llc` output, even though the tests were already passing.

This was identified by @efriedma-quic during review of #136290.

Submitting a separate PR to make sure these changes stay isolated.

Added: 
    

Modified: 
    llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/tailcc-ssp.ll

Removed: 
    


################################################################################
diff  --git a/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/tailcc-ssp.ll b/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/tailcc-ssp.ll
index 5211e4fe9eef9..7ea5dd49f0242 100644
--- a/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/tailcc-ssp.ll
+++ b/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/tailcc-ssp.ll
@@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ define void @tailcall_unrelated_frame() sspreq {
 ; WINDOWS-NEXT:    callq __security_check_cookie
 ; WINDOWS-NEXT:    int3
 ; WINDOWS-NEXT:    .seh_endproc
-
+;
 ; LINUX-LABEL: tailcall_unrelated_frame:
 ; LINUX:       # %bb.0:
 ; LINUX-NEXT:    pushq %rax
@@ -97,6 +97,7 @@ define void @tailcall_unrelated_frame() sspreq {
 ; LINUX-NEXT:    .cfi_def_cfa_offset 16
 ; LINUX-NEXT:    callq __stack_chk_fail at PLT
 
+
   call void @bar()
   tail call void @bar()
   ret void
@@ -105,18 +106,48 @@ define void @tailcall_unrelated_frame() sspreq {
 declare void @callee()
 define void @caller() sspreq {
 ; WINDOWS-LABEL: caller:
-; WINDOWS: callq   callee
-; WINDOWS: callq   callee
-; WINDOWS: cmpq    __security_cookie(%rip), %rcx
-; WINDOWS: jne
-; WINDOWS: callq   __security_check_cookie
-
+; WINDOWS:       # %bb.0:
+; WINDOWS-NEXT:    subq $40, %rsp
+; WINDOWS-NEXT:    .seh_stackalloc 40
+; WINDOWS-NEXT:    .seh_endprologue
+; WINDOWS-NEXT:    movq __security_cookie(%rip), %rax
+; WINDOWS-NEXT:    xorq %rsp, %rax
+; WINDOWS-NEXT:    movq %rax, {{[0-9]+}}(%rsp)
+; WINDOWS-NEXT:    callq callee
+; WINDOWS-NEXT:    callq callee
+; WINDOWS-NEXT:    movq {{[0-9]+}}(%rsp), %rcx
+; WINDOWS-NEXT:    xorq %rsp, %rcx
+; WINDOWS-NEXT:    cmpq __security_cookie(%rip), %rcx
+; WINDOWS-NEXT:    jne .LBB2_2
+; WINDOWS-NEXT:  # %bb.1:
+; WINDOWS-NEXT:    .seh_startepilogue
+; WINDOWS-NEXT:    addq $40, %rsp
+; WINDOWS-NEXT:    .seh_endepilogue
+; WINDOWS-NEXT:    retq
+; WINDOWS-NEXT:  .LBB2_2:
+; WINDOWS-NEXT:    callq __security_check_cookie
+; WINDOWS-NEXT:    int3
+; WINDOWS-NEXT:    .seh_endproc
+;
 ; LINUX-LABEL: caller:
-; LINUX: callq   callee at PLT
-; LINUX: callq   callee at PLT
-; LINUX: cmpq
-; LINUX: jne
-; LINUX: callq   __stack_chk_fail at PLT
+; LINUX:       # %bb.0:
+; LINUX-NEXT:    pushq %rax
+; LINUX-NEXT:    .cfi_def_cfa_offset 16
+; LINUX-NEXT:    movq %fs:40, %rax
+; LINUX-NEXT:    movq %rax, (%rsp)
+; LINUX-NEXT:    callq callee at PLT
+; LINUX-NEXT:    callq callee at PLT
+; LINUX-NEXT:    movq %fs:40, %rax
+; LINUX-NEXT:    cmpq (%rsp), %rax
+; LINUX-NEXT:    jne .LBB2_2
+; LINUX-NEXT:  # %bb.1: # %SP_return
+; LINUX-NEXT:    popq %rax
+; LINUX-NEXT:    .cfi_def_cfa_offset 8
+; LINUX-NEXT:    retq
+; LINUX-NEXT:  .LBB2_2: # %CallStackCheckFailBlk
+; LINUX-NEXT:    .cfi_def_cfa_offset 16
+; LINUX-NEXT:    callq __stack_chk_fail at PLT
+
 
   tail call void @callee()
   call void @callee()


        


More information about the llvm-commits mailing list