[llvm] AMDGPU: Remove redundant operand folding checks (PR #140587)
Changpeng Fang via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Jun 10 23:28:00 PDT 2025
================
@@ -777,24 +777,6 @@ bool SIFoldOperandsImpl::tryAddToFoldList(
return true;
}
- // Check the case where we might introduce a second constant operand to a
- // scalar instruction
- if (TII->isSALU(MI->getOpcode())) {
- const MCInstrDesc &InstDesc = MI->getDesc();
- const MCOperandInfo &OpInfo = InstDesc.operands()[OpNo];
-
- // Fine if the operand can be encoded as an inline constant
- if (!OpToFold->isReg() && !TII->isInlineConstant(*OpToFold, OpInfo)) {
- // Otherwise check for another constant
- for (unsigned i = 0, e = InstDesc.getNumOperands(); i != e; ++i) {
- auto &Op = MI->getOperand(i);
- if (OpNo != i && !Op.isReg() &&
- !TII->isInlineConstant(Op, InstDesc.operands()[i]))
- return false;
- }
- }
- }
-
----------------
changpeng wrote:
I am seeing a regression because of the removal of the above code:
For the following instructions:
%333:sreg_32 = S_MOV_B32 96
%334:sreg_32 = S_OR_B32 %stack.35.argument10.addr, %333:sreg_32, implicit-def dead $scc
After folding:
renamable $sgpr26 = S_OR_B32 896, 96, implicit-def dead $scc
@arsenm : can you explain why this pre-filtering is not necessary? Thanks.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140587
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list