[llvm] Add subtraction support for setLimitsForBinOp (PR #143618)
via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Jun 10 15:36:55 PDT 2025
llvmbot wrote:
<!--LLVM PR SUMMARY COMMENT-->
@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-analysis
Author: AZero13 (AZero13)
<details>
<summary>Changes</summary>
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/143618.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) llvm/lib/Analysis/ValueTracking.cpp (+54)
``````````diff
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Analysis/ValueTracking.cpp b/llvm/lib/Analysis/ValueTracking.cpp
index d8c1096049dce..88e8ea4878fe1 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Analysis/ValueTracking.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Analysis/ValueTracking.cpp
@@ -9576,6 +9576,60 @@ static void setLimitsForBinOp(const BinaryOperator &BO, APInt &Lower,
unsigned Width = Lower.getBitWidth();
const APInt *C;
switch (BO.getOpcode()) {
+ case Instruction::Sub:
+ if (match(BO.getOperand(1), m_APInt(C)) && !C->isZero()) {
+ bool HasNSW = IIQ.hasNoSignedWrap(&BO);
+ bool HasNUW = IIQ.hasNoUnsignedWrap(&BO);
+
+ // If the caller expects a signed compare, then try to use a signed range.
+ // Otherwise if both no-wraps are set, use the unsigned range because it
+ // is never larger than the signed range. Example:
+ // "sub nuw nsw i8 X, -2" is unsigned [0, 127] vs. signed [-128, 126].
+ if (PreferSignedRange && HasNSW && HasNUW)
+ HasNUW = false;
+
+ if (HasNUW) {
+ // 'sub nuw x, C' produces [0, UINT_MAX - C].
+ Upper = APInt::getAllOnes(Width) - *C + 1;
+ } else if (HasNSW) {
+ if (C->isNegative()) {
+ // 'sub nsw x, -C' produces [SINT_MIN + C, SINT_MAX].
+ Lower = APInt::getSignedMinValue(Width) + *C;
+ Upper = APInt::getSignedMaxValue(Width) + 1;
+ } else {
+ // 'sub nsw x, +C' produces [SINT_MIN, SINT_MAX - C].
+ Lower = APInt::getSignedMinValue(Width);
+ Upper = APInt::getSignedMaxValue(Width) - *C + 1;
+ }
+ }
+ } else if (match(BO.getOperand(0), m_APInt(C))) {
+ bool HasNSW = IIQ.hasNoSignedWrap(&BO);
+ bool HasNUW = IIQ.hasNoUnsignedWrap(&BO);
+
+ // If the caller expects a signed compare, then try to use a signed range.
+ // Otherwise if both no-wraps are set, use the unsigned range because it
+ // is never larger than the signed range. Example:
+ // "sub nuw nsw i8 X, -2" is unsigned [0, 127] vs. signed [-128, 126].
+ if (PreferSignedRange && HasNSW && HasNUW)
+ HasNUW = false;
+
+ if (HasNUW) {
+ // 'sub nuw c, x' produces [0, C].
+ Upper = *C + 1;
+ } else if (HasNSW) {
+ if (C->isNegative()) {
+ // 'sub nsw C, x' produces [SINT_MIN, SINT_MAX - C].
+ Lower = APInt::getSignedMinValue(Width);
+ Upper = APInt::getSignedMaxValue(Width) - *C + 1;
+ } else {
+ // Note that sub 0, INT_MIN is not NSW. It techically is a signed wrap
+ // 'sub nsw C, x' produces [SINT_MIN + 1 + C, SINT_MAX].
+ Lower = APInt::getSignedMinValue(Width) + *C + 1;
+ Upper = APInt::getSignedMaxValue(Width) + 1;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ break;
case Instruction::Add:
if (match(BO.getOperand(1), m_APInt(C)) && !C->isZero()) {
bool HasNSW = IIQ.hasNoSignedWrap(&BO);
``````````
</details>
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/143618
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list