[llvm] [SimplifyCFG][swifterror] Don't sink calls with swifterror params (PR #139015)
Ellis Hoag via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu May 8 09:37:55 PDT 2025
ellishg wrote:
> In particular, legality here depends on whether sinking requires the introduction of a phi node or not. Could you add test variant where the swifterror argument is the same in both calls, and another argument differs?
Just to make sure I understand. In this case the sink would be safe, right?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/139015
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list