[llvm] Added clarifying comment to 'LLVMLinkInMCJIT' and 'LLVMLinkInInterpreter' (PR #92467)

[via llvm-commits]

Minding000 wrote:

@lhames Yes, there are no bugs, just confusion.

I like the idea of hiding these functions in the dylib interface, as they don't serve a purpose there, but I don't know how to do that. I'm open to commits or hints though.

I guess it depends on how common the usecase of switching between static and dynamic libraries is. To me it sounds like a niche usecase and the workaround is pretty humane. But for these cases this would be a breaking change.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92467