[llvm] [LangRef] No target-specific size limit for atomics (PR #136864)

[Michael Kruse via llvm-commits]

Meinersbur wrote:

> I think your current proposed wording is fine.

If by prosposed wording you mean the state of the current PR which just removes the part (in contrast to item 5 in https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/136864#issuecomment-2835643243), can you approve it?

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/136864