[llvm] [GVN] Improve processBlock for instruction erasure (PR #131753)

[via llvm-commits]

github-actions[bot] wrote:

<!--LLVM CODE FORMAT COMMENT: {clang-format}-->


:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code. :warning:

<details>
<summary>
You can test this locally with the following command:
</summary>

``````````bash
git-clang-format --diff HEAD~1 HEAD --extensions cpp,h -- llvm/include/llvm/Transforms/Scalar/GVN.h llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/GVN.cpp
``````````

</details>

<details>
<summary>
View the diff from clang-format here.
</summary>

``````````diff
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/GVN.cpp b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/GVN.cpp
index ff1b67191..8234e4302 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/GVN.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/GVN.cpp
@@ -727,8 +727,8 @@ void GVNPass::ValueTable::erase(Value *V) {
 /// verifyRemoved - Verify that the value is removed from all internal data
 /// structures.
 void GVNPass::ValueTable::verifyRemoved(const Value *V) const {
-    assert(!ValueNumbering.contains(V) &&
-           "Inst still occurs in value numbering map!");
+  assert(!ValueNumbering.contains(V) &&
+         "Inst still occurs in value numbering map!");
 }
 
 //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//

``````````

</details>


https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/131753