[llvm] Fix 'unannotated fall-through between switch labels' warning. (PR #136000)

[via llvm-commits]

llvmbot wrote:


<!--LLVM PR SUMMARY COMMENT-->

@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-selectiondag

Author: Jonas Paulsson (JonPsson1)

<details>
<summary>Changes</summary>



---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/136000.diff


1 Files Affected:

- (modified) llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeDAG.cpp (+2-2) 


``````````diff
diff --git a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeDAG.cpp b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeDAG.cpp
index fddb99d2f0b22..b596f6b8d6ce2 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeDAG.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeDAG.cpp
@@ -5467,8 +5467,8 @@ void SelectionDAGLegalize::PromoteNode(SDNode *Node) {
                     DAG.getIntPtrConstant(0, dl, /*isTarget=*/true)));
     break;
 
-  case ISD::STRICT_FMINIMUM: {
-  case ISD::STRICT_FMAXIMUM:
+  case ISD::STRICT_FMINIMUM:
+  case ISD::STRICT_FMAXIMUM: {
     SDValue InChain = Node->getOperand(0);
     SDVTList VTs = DAG.getVTList(NVT, MVT::Other);
     Tmp1 = DAG.getNode(ISD::STRICT_FP_EXTEND, dl, VTs, InChain,

``````````

</details>


https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/136000