[llvm] [BOLT] Gadget scanner: detect non-protected indirect calls (PR #131899)

[via llvm-commits]

github-actions[bot] wrote:

<!--LLVM CODE FORMAT COMMENT: {clang-format}-->


:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code. :warning:

<details>
<summary>
You can test this locally with the following command:
</summary>

``````````bash
git-clang-format --diff b6b40e9ac980518d7270b4ac880496b91efc8ca5 8865d1ac35a1d1b34229db2243c9d825d63285df --extensions cpp,h -- bolt/include/bolt/Core/MCPlusBuilder.h bolt/include/bolt/Passes/PAuthGadgetScanner.h bolt/include/bolt/Utils/CommandLineOpts.h bolt/lib/Passes/PAuthGadgetScanner.cpp bolt/lib/Rewrite/RewriteInstance.cpp bolt/lib/Target/AArch64/AArch64MCPlusBuilder.cpp
``````````

</details>

<details>
<summary>
View the diff from clang-format here.
</summary>

``````````diff
diff --git a/bolt/lib/Rewrite/RewriteInstance.cpp b/bolt/lib/Rewrite/RewriteInstance.cpp
index b400c5caa8..627ccd30ad 100644
--- a/bolt/lib/Rewrite/RewriteInstance.cpp
+++ b/bolt/lib/Rewrite/RewriteInstance.cpp
@@ -249,11 +249,11 @@ static cl::opt<bool> WriteBoltInfoSection(
 
 cl::bits<GadgetScannerKind> GadgetScannersToRun(
     "scanners", cl::desc("which gadget scanners to run"),
-    cl::values(clEnumValN(GS_PACRET, "pacret",
-                          "pac-ret: return address protection (subset of \"pauth\")"),
-               clEnumValN(GS_PAUTH, "pauth",
-                          "All Pointer Authentication scanners"),
-               clEnumValN(GS_ALL, "all", "All implemented scanners")),
+    cl::values(
+        clEnumValN(GS_PACRET, "pacret",
+                   "pac-ret: return address protection (subset of \"pauth\")"),
+        clEnumValN(GS_PAUTH, "pauth", "All Pointer Authentication scanners"),
+        clEnumValN(GS_ALL, "all", "All implemented scanners")),
     cl::ZeroOrMore, cl::CommaSeparated, cl::cat(BinaryAnalysisCategory));
 
 } // namespace opts

``````````

</details>


https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/131899