[llvm] [ci] Add ids workflow for checking llvm apis have been annotated with LLVM_ABI (PR #128370)
Aiden Grossman via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Mar 14 09:57:36 PDT 2025
boomanaiden154 wrote:
> No it is not, and that is the reason for putting this up early. This is to help prevent backslide while the work continues to properly annotate the codebase. This is a long process and it isn't reasonable to put up a patch to make everything clean in one go as it would touch so many headers across so many different areas.
So if someone puts up a patch that touches a file that has not been annotated yet (completely unrelated to the annotation effort), this check would flag it?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/128370
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list