[llvm] [LAA] Be more careful when evaluating AddRecs at symbolic max BTC. (PR #128061)
Ramkumar Ramachandra via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Feb 20 13:53:41 PST 2025
================
@@ -250,9 +267,11 @@ void RuntimePointerChecking::insert(Loop *Lp, Value *Ptr, const SCEV *PtrExpr,
unsigned DepSetId, unsigned ASId,
PredicatedScalarEvolution &PSE,
bool NeedsFreeze) {
- const SCEV *MaxBECount = PSE.getSymbolicMaxBackedgeTakenCount();
- const auto &[ScStart, ScEnd] = getStartAndEndForAccess(
- Lp, PtrExpr, AccessTy, MaxBECount, PSE.getSE(), &DC.getPointerBounds());
+ const SCEV *SymbolicMaxBTC = PSE.getSymbolicMaxBackedgeTakenCount();
+ const SCEV *BTC = PSE.getBackedgeTakenCount();
+ const auto &[ScStart, ScEnd] =
+ getStartAndEndForAccess(Lp, PtrExpr, AccessTy, BTC, SymbolicMaxBTC,
+ PSE.getSE(), &DC.getPointerBounds());
----------------
artagnon wrote:
Are we changing this because the exact BTC gives better results in some cases?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/128061
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list