[llvm] [RISCV] Add DAG combine to convert (iN reduce.add (zext (vXi1 A to vXiN)) into vcpop.m (PR #127497)

[Pengcheng Wang via llvm-commits]

================
@@ -18100,25 +18100,38 @@ static SDValue combineTruncToVnclip(SDNode *N, SelectionDAG &DAG,
 //   (iX ctpop (bitcast (vXi1 A)))
 // ->
 //   (zext (vcpop.m (nxvYi1 (insert_subvec (vXi1 A)))))
+// and
+//   (iN reduce.add (zext (vXi1 A to vXiN))
+// ->
+//   (zext (vcpop.m (nxvYi1 (insert_subvec (vXi1 A)))))
 // FIXME: It's complicated to match all the variations of this after type
 // legalization so we only handle the pre-type legalization pattern, but that
 // requires the fixed vector type to be legal.
-static SDValue combineScalarCTPOPToVCPOP(SDNode *N, SelectionDAG &DAG,
-                                         const RISCVSubtarget &Subtarget) {
+static SDValue combineVCPOP(SDNode *N, SelectionDAG &DAG,
+                            const RISCVSubtarget &Subtarget) {
+  unsigned Opc = N->getOpcode();
+  assert((Opc == ISD::CTPOP || Opc == ISD::VECREDUCE_ADD) &&
+         "Unexpected opcode");
   EVT VT = N->getValueType(0);
   if (!VT.isScalarInteger())
     return SDValue();
 
   SDValue Src = N->getOperand(0);
 
-  // Peek through zero_extend. It doesn't change the count.
-  if (Src.getOpcode() == ISD::ZERO_EXTEND)
-    Src = Src.getOperand(0);
+  if (Opc == ISD::CTPOP) {
+    // Peek through zero_extend. It doesn't change the count.
+    if (Src.getOpcode() == ISD::ZERO_EXTEND)
+      Src = Src.getOperand(0);
 
-  if (Src.getOpcode() != ISD::BITCAST)
-    return SDValue();
+    if (Src.getOpcode() != ISD::BITCAST)
+      return SDValue();
+    Src = Src.getOperand(0);
+  } else if (Opc == ISD::VECREDUCE_ADD) {
+    if (Src.getOpcode() != ISD::ZERO_EXTEND)
----------------
wangpc-pp wrote:

Is zero_extend mandatory in this pattern?

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127497