[llvm] [AsmParser][NFCI] Restructure DiagnosticPredicate (PR #126653)

Sander de Smalen via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Feb 13 01:40:11 PST 2025


================
@@ -198,21 +192,36 @@ enum class DiagnosticPredicateTy {
 // This is a light-weight alternative to the 'NearMissInfo' approach
 // below which collects *all* possible diagnostics. This alternative
 // is optional and fully backward compatible with existing
-// PredicateMethods that return a 'bool' (match or no match).
-struct DiagnosticPredicate {
-  DiagnosticPredicateTy Type;
-
-  explicit DiagnosticPredicate(bool Match)
-      : Type(Match ? DiagnosticPredicateTy::Match
-                   : DiagnosticPredicateTy::NearMatch) {}
-  DiagnosticPredicate(DiagnosticPredicateTy T) : Type(T) {}
-  DiagnosticPredicate(const DiagnosticPredicate &) = default;
+// PredicateMethods that return a 'bool' (match or near match).
+class DiagnosticPredicate {
+  enum class PredicateTy {
+    Match,     // Matches
+    NearMatch, // Close Match: use Specific Diagnostic
+    NoMatch,   // No Match: use `InvalidOperand`
+  } Predicate;
+
+public:
+#if __cplusplus >= 202002L
+  using enum PredicateTy;
+#else
+  static constexpr PredicateTy Match = PredicateTy::Match;
+  static constexpr PredicateTy NearMatch = PredicateTy::NearMatch;
+  static constexpr PredicateTy NoMatch = PredicateTy::NoMatch;
+#endif
----------------
sdesmalen-arm wrote:

My preferred way forward would be to remove the bool constructor from `DiagnosticPredicate`; it seems wrong to always assume `NearMatch` rather than `NoMatch` for the `bool = false` case, but that will be a bigger change.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126653


More information about the llvm-commits mailing list