[llvm] [BOLT]Identify indirect call (PR #123305)

via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Jan 24 05:02:39 PST 2025


liusy58 wrote:

> I presume this is why you require the function not to be a isMultiEntry?
yes, you're right. In fact, even the target is in the same function, it is also safe to regard this call as an indirect tail call since the stack remains unchanged.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123305


More information about the llvm-commits mailing list