[llvm] [NewPM] LiveIntervals: Check dependencies for invalidation (PR #123563)
Arthur Eubanks via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Jan 23 11:31:08 PST 2025
================
@@ -127,6 +127,20 @@ LiveIntervalsWrapperPass::LiveIntervalsWrapperPass() : MachineFunctionPass(ID) {
LiveIntervals::~LiveIntervals() { clear(); }
+bool LiveIntervals::invalidate(
+ MachineFunction &MF, const PreservedAnalyses &PA,
+ MachineFunctionAnalysisManager::Invalidator &Inv) {
+ auto PAC = PA.getChecker<LiveIntervalsAnalysis>();
+
+ if (!PAC.preserved() && !PAC.preservedSet<AllAnalysesOn<MachineFunction>>())
+ return true;
+
+ // LiveIntervals holds pointers to these results, so check for their
+ // invalidation.
+ return (Inv.invalidate<SlotIndexesAnalysis>(MF, PA) ||
+ Inv.invalidate<MachineDominatorTreeAnalysis>(MF, PA));
+}
----------------
aeubanks wrote:
> Yes, it is related here [#123045 (comment)](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123045#issuecomment-2592793893)
>
> New PM can't report such cases. Could add such a functionality behind a flag but I guess it's unlikely for more cases like this to exist, since they would lead to invalid reads (as the PM deletes the results).
I don't think it's easily trackable which analyses depend on other analyses without a bunch of extra infrastructure, so unless this is a problem that comes up a lot I'm inclined to say it's not worth the effort
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123563
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list