[clang] [llvm] [polly] [NFC][DebugInfo] Use iterator moveBefore at many call-sites (PR #123583)
Orlando Cazalet-Hyams via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Jan 23 03:24:08 PST 2025
================
@@ -8890,21 +8890,21 @@ bool CodeGenPrepare::fixupDbgVariableRecord(DbgVariableRecord &DVR) {
return AnyChange;
}
-static void DbgInserterHelper(DbgValueInst *DVI, Instruction *VI) {
+static void DbgInserterHelper(DbgValueInst *DVI, BasicBlock::iterator VI) {
DVI->removeFromParent();
if (isa<PHINode>(VI))
- DVI->insertBefore(&*VI->getParent()->getFirstInsertionPt());
+ DVI->insertBefore(VI->getParent()->getFirstInsertionPt());
else
DVI->insertAfter(VI);
}
-static void DbgInserterHelper(DbgVariableRecord *DVR, Instruction *VI) {
+static void DbgInserterHelper(DbgVariableRecord *DVR, BasicBlock::iterator VI) {
DVR->removeFromParent();
BasicBlock *VIBB = VI->getParent();
if (isa<PHINode>(VI))
VIBB->insertDbgRecordBefore(DVR, VIBB->getFirstInsertionPt());
else
- VIBB->insertDbgRecordAfter(DVR, VI);
+ VIBB->insertDbgRecordAfter(DVR, &*VI);
----------------
OCHyams wrote:
Is this a code-transition-state bug, or is there some reason we've got to use the Instruction * overload here? I suppose it doesn't matter either way for dbg records.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123583
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list