[clang] [llvm] [X86][AVX10.2-SATCVT][NFC] Remove NE from intrinsic and instruction name (PR #123275)

[Phoebe Wang via llvm-commits]

================
@@ -603,13 +603,13 @@ defm VCVTPS2IUBS : avx10_sat_cvt_base<0x6b, "vcvtps2iubs", SchedWriteVecIMul,
                                     X86vcvtp2iubsRnd>,
                    AVX512PDIi8Base, T_MAP5, EVEX_CD8<32, CD8VF>;
 
-defm VCVTTNEBF162IBS : avx10_sat_cvt_base<0x68, "vcvttnebf162ibs",
-                                          SchedWriteVecIMul, X86vcvttp2ibs,
-                                          avx512vl_i16_info, avx512vl_bf16_info>,
+defm VCVTTBF162IBS : avx10_sat_cvt_base<0x68, "vcvttbf162ibs",
+                                        SchedWriteVecIMul, X86vcvttp2ibs,
+                                        avx512vl_i16_info, avx512vl_bf16_info>,
                        AVX512XDIi8Base, T_MAP5, EVEX_CD8<16, CD8VF>;
-defm VCVTTNEBF162IUBS : avx10_sat_cvt_base<0x6a, "vcvttnebf162iubs",
-                                           SchedWriteVecIMul, X86vcvttp2iubs,
-                                           avx512vl_i16_info, avx512vl_bf16_info>,
+defm VCVTTBF162IUBS : avx10_sat_cvt_base<0x6a, "vcvttbf162iubs",
+                                         SchedWriteVecIMul, X86vcvttp2iubs,
+                                         avx512vl_i16_info, avx512vl_bf16_info>,
                         AVX512XDIi8Base, T_MAP5, EVEX_CD8<16, CD8VF>;
----------------
phoebewang wrote:

There's no uniform rule on this. So I usually just pay attention to arguments in `<>`.
Align `AVX512XDIi8Base` with `avx10_sat_cvt_base` doesn't make much sense, because one is `class` while the other is `multiclass`. We uaually align them if we have more than one `multiclass`.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123275