[llvm] LangRef: Clarify llvm.minnum and llvm.maxnum about sNaN and signed zero (PR #112852)

[Joshua Cranmer via llvm-commits]

================
@@ -16574,21 +16574,35 @@ type.
 
 Semantics:
 """"""""""
+Follows the semantics of minNum in IEEE-754-2008, except that -0.0 < +0.0 for the purposes
+of this intrinsic. As for signaling NaNs, per the minNum semantics, if either operand
+is an sNaN, the result is always a qNaN. This matches the recommended behavior for the libm
+function `fmin`, although not all implementations have implemented these recommended behaviors.
----------------
jcranmer-intel wrote:

Restructured text requires double-backticks to get monotype text, not single backticks.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112852