[llvm] [PowerPC] Deprecate uses of ISD::ADDC/ISD::ADDE/ISD::SUBC/ISD::SUBE (PR #116984)

[Maryam Moghadas via llvm-commits]

================
@@ -18252,11 +18320,13 @@ static SDValue combineADDToADDZE(SDNode *N, SelectionDAG &DAG,
     SDValue Add = DAG.getNode(ISD::ADD, DL, MVT::i64, Z,
                               DAG.getConstant(NegConstant, DL, MVT::i64));
     SDValue AddOrZ = NegConstant != 0 ? Add : Z;
-    SDValue Addc = DAG.getNode(ISD::ADDC, DL, DAG.getVTList(MVT::i64, MVT::Glue),
-                               AddOrZ, DAG.getConstant(-1ULL, DL, MVT::i64));
-    return DAG.getNode(ISD::ADDE, DL, VTs, LHS, DAG.getConstant(0, DL, MVT::i64),
+    SDValue Addc =
+        DAG.getNode(ISD::UADDO, DL, DAG.getVTList(MVT::i64, CarryType), AddOrZ,
----------------
maryammo wrote:

>From [ISD reference](https://llvm.org/doxygen/namespacellvm_1_1ISD.html#a22ea9cec080dd5f4f47ba234c2f59110a20084f62caecb0db80ad71bdabda73c2),
UADDO_CARRY: These opcodes are different from [US]{ADD,SUB}O in that U{ADD,SUB}O_CARRY consume and produce a **_carry/borrow_**, whereas [US]{ADD,SUB}O produce an **_overflow_**. 


https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/116984