[llvm] [ValueTracking] Provide getUnderlyingObjectAggressive fallback (PR #123019)
via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Jan 14 22:30:36 PST 2025
llvmbot wrote:
<!--LLVM PR SUMMARY COMMENT-->
@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-analysis
@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-transforms
Author: Heejin Ahn (aheejin)
<details>
<summary>Changes</summary>
This callsite assumes `getUnderlyingObjectAggressive` returns a non-null pointer:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/273a94b3d5a78cd9122c7b3bbb5d5a87147735d2/llvm/lib/Transforms/IPO/FunctionAttrs.cpp#L124
But it can return null when there are cycles in the value chain so there is no more `Worklist` item anymore to explore, in which case it just returns `Object` at the end of the function without ever setting it: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/9b5857a68381652dbea2a0c9efa734b6c4cf38c9/llvm/lib/Analysis/ValueTracking.cpp#L6866-L6867 https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/9b5857a68381652dbea2a0c9efa734b6c4cf38c9/llvm/lib/Analysis/ValueTracking.cpp#L6889
`getUnderlyingObject` does not seem to return null either judging by looking at its code and its callsites, so I think it is not likely to be the author's intention that `getUnderlyingObjectAggressive` returns null.
So this checks whether `Object` is null at the end, and if so, falls back to the original first value.
---
The test case here was reduced by bugpoint and further reduced manually, but I find it hard to reduce it further.
To trigger this bug, the memory operation should not be reachable from the entry BB, because the `phi`s should form a cycle without introducing another value from the entry. I tried a minimal `phi` cycle with three BBs (entry BB + two BBs in a cycle), but it was skipped here: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/273a94b3d5a78cd9122c7b3bbb5d5a87147735d2/llvm/lib/Transforms/IPO/FunctionAttrs.cpp#L121-L122 To get the result that's not `ModRefInfo::NoModRef`, the length of `phi` chain needed to be greater than the `MaxLookup` value set in this function:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/02403f4e450b86d93197dd34045ff40a34b21494/llvm/lib/Analysis/BasicAliasAnalysis.cpp#L744
But just lengthening the `phi` chain to 8 didn't trigger the same error in `getUnderlyingObjectAggressive` because `getUnderlyingObject` here passes through a single-chain `phi`s so not all `phi`s end up in `Visited`:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/9b5857a68381652dbea2a0c9efa734b6c4cf38c9/llvm/lib/Analysis/ValueTracking.cpp#L6863
So I just submit here the smallest test case I managed to create.
---
Fixes #<!-- -->117308 and fixes #<!-- -->122166.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123019.diff
2 Files Affected:
- (modified) llvm/lib/Analysis/ValueTracking.cpp (+1-1)
- (added) llvm/test/Transforms/FunctionAttrs/phi_cycle.ll (+52)
``````````diff
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Analysis/ValueTracking.cpp b/llvm/lib/Analysis/ValueTracking.cpp
index 4b246c013e96f1..119aba7729f85a 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Analysis/ValueTracking.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Analysis/ValueTracking.cpp
@@ -6886,7 +6886,7 @@ const Value *llvm::getUnderlyingObjectAggressive(const Value *V) {
return FirstObject;
} while (!Worklist.empty());
- return Object;
+ return Object ? Object : FirstObject;
}
/// This is the function that does the work of looking through basic
diff --git a/llvm/test/Transforms/FunctionAttrs/phi_cycle.ll b/llvm/test/Transforms/FunctionAttrs/phi_cycle.ll
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000000..137becd76588e1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/llvm/test/Transforms/FunctionAttrs/phi_cycle.ll
@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
+; RUN: opt -passes=function-attrs -S < %s
+
+; Regression test for a null-returning bug of getUnderlyingObjectAggressive().
+; This should not crash.
+define void @phi_cycle() {
+bb:
+ unreachable
+
+bb1: ; preds = %bb17
+ br label %bb2
+
+bb2: ; preds = %bb5, %bb1
+ %phi = phi ptr [ %phi6, %bb1 ], [ %phi6, %bb5 ]
+ br i1 poison, label %bb4, label %bb3
+
+bb3: ; preds = %bb2
+ %getelementptr = getelementptr inbounds i8, ptr %phi, i32 poison
+ br label %bb5
+
+bb4: ; preds = %bb2
+ br label %bb7
+
+bb5: ; preds = %bb15, %bb3
+ %phi6 = phi ptr [ %getelementptr, %bb3 ], [ %phi16, %bb15 ]
+ br i1 poison, label %bb17, label %bb2
+
+bb7: ; preds = %bb15, %bb4
+ %phi8 = phi ptr [ %phi, %bb4 ], [ %phi16, %bb15 ]
+ br i1 poison, label %bb11, label %bb9
+
+bb9: ; preds = %bb7
+ %getelementptr10 = getelementptr inbounds i8, ptr %phi8, i32 1
+ store i8 poison, ptr %phi8, align 1
+ br label %bb15
+
+bb11: ; preds = %bb7
+ br i1 poison, label %bb13, label %bb12
+
+bb12: ; preds = %bb11
+ br label %bb13
+
+bb13: ; preds = %bb12, %bb11
+ %getelementptr14 = getelementptr inbounds i8, ptr %phi8, i32 poison
+ br label %bb15
+
+bb15: ; preds = %bb13, %bb9
+ %phi16 = phi ptr [ %getelementptr14, %bb13 ], [ %getelementptr10, %bb9 ]
+ br i1 poison, label %bb5, label %bb7
+
+bb17: ; preds = %bb5
+ br label %bb1
+}
``````````
</details>
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123019
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list