[llvm] Complex deinterleaving/single reductions build fixReapply "Add support for single reductions in ComplexDeinterleavingPass (#112875)" (PR #120441)

via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Dec 18 07:32:55 PST 2024


github-actions[bot] wrote:

<!--LLVM CODE FORMAT COMMENT: {clang-format}-->


:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code. :warning:

<details>
<summary>
You can test this locally with the following command:
</summary>

``````````bash
git-clang-format --diff 76714be5fd4ace66dd9e19ce706c2e2149dd5716 5add9275e164f7804bf8c69e81f1d0829ffb1e7a --extensions h,cpp -- llvm/include/llvm/CodeGen/ComplexDeinterleavingPass.h llvm/lib/CodeGen/ComplexDeinterleavingPass.cpp llvm/lib/Target/AArch64/AArch64ISelLowering.cpp
``````````

</details>

<details>
<summary>
View the diff from clang-format here.
</summary>

``````````diff
diff --git a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/ComplexDeinterleavingPass.cpp b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/ComplexDeinterleavingPass.cpp
index 603782a1b2..77f52547fa 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/ComplexDeinterleavingPass.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/ComplexDeinterleavingPass.cpp
@@ -1764,7 +1764,8 @@ bool ComplexDeinterleavingGraph::checkNodes() {
       FoundDeinterleaveNode = true;
   }
 
-  // We need a deinterleave node in order to guarantee that we're working with complex numbers.
+  // We need a deinterleave node in order to guarantee that we're working with
+  // complex numbers.
   if (!FoundDeinterleaveNode)
     return false;
 

``````````

</details>


https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120441


More information about the llvm-commits mailing list