[llvm] [AVR] Force relocations for jumps and calls (PR #118015)

Ben Shi via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Dec 2 02:12:55 PST 2024


benshi001 wrote:

> Hmm, so we'd like to diverge from avr-gcc's behavior, right?

Is there a strong reason for us to strictly follow avr-gcc? My key concern is that the AVR backend has been stable, we need not do aggressive functional changes.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/118015


More information about the llvm-commits mailing list