[llvm] f7ef072 - [SCEV] Do not allow refinement in the rewriting of BEValue (#117152)

via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Sun Dec 1 04:11:13 PST 2024


Author: Yingwei Zheng
Date: 2024-12-01T20:11:09+08:00
New Revision: f7ef0721d60f85e1f699f8d1b83d4402ae19b122

URL: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f7ef0721d60f85e1f699f8d1b83d4402ae19b122
DIFF: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f7ef0721d60f85e1f699f8d1b83d4402ae19b122.diff

LOG: [SCEV] Do not allow refinement in the rewriting of BEValue (#117152)

See the following case:
```
; bin/opt -passes="print<scalar-evolution>" test.ll --disable-output
define i32 @widget() {
b:
  br label %b1

b1:                                              ; preds = %b5, %b
  %phi = phi i32 [ 0, %b ], [ %udiv6, %b5 ]
  %phi2 = phi i32 [ 1, %b ], [ %add, %b5 ]
  %icmp = icmp eq i32 %phi, 0
  br i1 %icmp, label %b3, label %b8

b3:                                              ; preds = %b1
  %udiv = udiv i32 10, %phi2
  %urem = urem i32 %udiv, 10
  %icmp4 = icmp eq i32 %urem, 0
  br i1 %icmp4, label %b7, label %b5

b5:                                              ; preds = %b3
  %udiv6 = udiv i32 %phi2, 0
  %add = add i32 %phi2, 1
  br label %b1

b7:                                              ; preds = %b3
  ret i32 5

b8:                                              ; preds = %b1
  ret i32 7
}
```
```
%phi2 = phi i32 [ 1, %b ], [ %add, %b5 ] -->  {1,+,1}<nuw><nsw><%b1>
%udiv6 = udiv i32 %phi2, 0 --> ({1,+,1}<nuw><nsw><%b1> /u 0)
%phi = phi i32 [ 0, %b ], [ %udiv6, %b5 ] --> ({0,+,1}<nuw><nsw><%b1> /u 0)
```
`ScalarEvolution::createAddRecFromPHI` gives a wrong SCEV result for
`%phi`:

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/d7d6fb1804415b0f3e7f1cc9290bfb3d711cb707/llvm/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp#L5926-L5950
It converts `phi(0, ({1,+,1}<nuw><nsw><%b1> /u 0))` into `phi(0 / 0,
({1,+,1}<nuw><nsw><%b1> /u 0))`. Then it simplifies the expr into
`{0,+,1}<nuw><nsw><%b1> /u 0`.

As we did in
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/acd700a24b6f767413db3d525e06d03e4245aa40,
this patch disallows udiv simplification if we cannot prove that the
denominator is a well-defined non-zero value.

Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/117133.

Added: 
    llvm/test/Analysis/ScalarEvolution/pr117133.ll
    llvm/test/Transforms/IndVarSimplify/pr117133.ll

Modified: 
    llvm/include/llvm/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.h
    llvm/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp

Removed: 
    


################################################################################
diff  --git a/llvm/include/llvm/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.h b/llvm/include/llvm/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.h
index 885c5985f9d23a..b20c6a13cb6bd7 100644
--- a/llvm/include/llvm/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.h
+++ b/llvm/include/llvm/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.h
@@ -2187,6 +2187,9 @@ class ScalarEvolution {
   bool isGuaranteedToTransferExecutionTo(const Instruction *A,
                                          const Instruction *B);
 
+  /// Returns true if \p Op is guaranteed not to cause immediate UB.
+  bool isGuaranteedNotToCauseUB(const SCEV *Op);
+
   /// Returns true if \p Op is guaranteed to not be poison.
   static bool isGuaranteedNotToBePoison(const SCEV *Op);
 

diff  --git a/llvm/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp b/llvm/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp
index c3f296b9ff3347..882e938e69c0c2 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp
@@ -4307,15 +4307,7 @@ ScalarEvolution::getSequentialMinMaxExpr(SCEVTypes Kind,
   }
 
   for (unsigned i = 1, e = Ops.size(); i != e; ++i) {
-    bool MayBeUB = SCEVExprContains(Ops[i], [this](const SCEV *S) {
-      auto *UDiv = dyn_cast<SCEVUDivExpr>(S);
-      // The UDiv may be UB if the divisor is poison or zero. Unless the divisor
-      // is a non-zero constant, we have to assume the UDiv may be UB.
-      return UDiv && (!isKnownNonZero(UDiv->getOperand(1)) ||
-                      !isGuaranteedNotToBePoison(UDiv->getOperand(1)));
-    });
-
-    if (MayBeUB)
+    if (!isGuaranteedNotToCauseUB(Ops[i]))
       continue;
     // We can replace %x umin_seq %y with %x umin %y if either:
     //  * %y being poison implies %x is also poison.
@@ -5933,18 +5925,22 @@ const SCEV *ScalarEvolution::createAddRecFromPHI(PHINode *PN) {
     // We can generalize this saying that i is the shifted value of BEValue
     // by one iteration:
     //   PHI(f(0), f({1,+,1})) --> f({0,+,1})
-    const SCEV *Shifted = SCEVShiftRewriter::rewrite(BEValue, L, *this);
-    const SCEV *Start = SCEVInitRewriter::rewrite(Shifted, L, *this, false);
-    if (Shifted != getCouldNotCompute() &&
-        Start != getCouldNotCompute()) {
-      const SCEV *StartVal = getSCEV(StartValueV);
-      if (Start == StartVal) {
-        // Okay, for the entire analysis of this edge we assumed the PHI
-        // to be symbolic.  We now need to go back and purge all of the
-        // entries for the scalars that use the symbolic expression.
-        forgetMemoizedResults(SymbolicName);
-        insertValueToMap(PN, Shifted);
-        return Shifted;
+
+    // Do not allow refinement in rewriting of BEValue.
+    if (isGuaranteedNotToCauseUB(BEValue)) {
+      const SCEV *Shifted = SCEVShiftRewriter::rewrite(BEValue, L, *this);
+      const SCEV *Start = SCEVInitRewriter::rewrite(Shifted, L, *this, false);
+      if (Shifted != getCouldNotCompute() && Start != getCouldNotCompute() &&
+          ::impliesPoison(BEValue, Start)) {
+        const SCEV *StartVal = getSCEV(StartValueV);
+        if (Start == StartVal) {
+          // Okay, for the entire analysis of this edge we assumed the PHI
+          // to be symbolic.  We now need to go back and purge all of the
+          // entries for the scalars that use the symbolic expression.
+          forgetMemoizedResults(SymbolicName);
+          insertValueToMap(PN, Shifted);
+          return Shifted;
+        }
       }
     }
   }
@@ -7324,6 +7320,16 @@ bool ScalarEvolution::isGuaranteedNotToBePoison(const SCEV *Op) {
   return PC.MaybePoison.empty();
 }
 
+bool ScalarEvolution::isGuaranteedNotToCauseUB(const SCEV *Op) {
+  return !SCEVExprContains(Op, [this](const SCEV *S) {
+    auto *UDiv = dyn_cast<SCEVUDivExpr>(S);
+    // The UDiv may be UB if the divisor is poison or zero. Unless the divisor
+    // is a non-zero constant, we have to assume the UDiv may be UB.
+    return UDiv && (!isKnownNonZero(UDiv->getOperand(1)) ||
+                    !isGuaranteedNotToBePoison(UDiv->getOperand(1)));
+  });
+}
+
 bool ScalarEvolution::isSCEVExprNeverPoison(const Instruction *I) {
   // Only proceed if we can prove that I does not yield poison.
   if (!programUndefinedIfPoison(I))

diff  --git a/llvm/test/Analysis/ScalarEvolution/pr117133.ll b/llvm/test/Analysis/ScalarEvolution/pr117133.ll
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000000..3aadc18d6157c8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/llvm/test/Analysis/ScalarEvolution/pr117133.ll
@@ -0,0 +1,97 @@
+; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_analyze_test_checks.py UTC_ARGS: --version 5
+; RUN: opt -S -disable-output "-passes=print<scalar-evolution>" < %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
+
+define i32 @widget() {
+; CHECK-LABEL: 'widget'
+; CHECK-NEXT:  Classifying expressions for: @widget
+; CHECK-NEXT:    %phi = phi i32 [ 0, %b ], [ %udiv6, %b5 ]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    --> %phi U: [0,1) S: [0,1) Exits: <<Unknown>> LoopDispositions: { %b1: Variant }
+; CHECK-NEXT:    %phi2 = phi i32 [ 1, %b ], [ %add, %b5 ]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    --> {1,+,1}<nuw><nsw><%b1> U: [1,2) S: [1,2) Exits: <<Unknown>> LoopDispositions: { %b1: Computable }
+; CHECK-NEXT:    %udiv = udiv i32 10, %phi2
+; CHECK-NEXT:    --> (10 /u {1,+,1}<nuw><nsw><%b1>) U: [10,11) S: [10,11) Exits: <<Unknown>> LoopDispositions: { %b1: Computable }
+; CHECK-NEXT:    %urem = urem i32 %udiv, 10
+; CHECK-NEXT:    --> ((-10 * ((10 /u {1,+,1}<nuw><nsw><%b1>) /u 10))<nuw><nsw> + (10 /u {1,+,1}<nuw><nsw><%b1>)) U: [0,1) S: [0,1) Exits: <<Unknown>> LoopDispositions: { %b1: Computable }
+; CHECK-NEXT:    %udiv6 = udiv i32 %phi2, 0
+; CHECK-NEXT:    --> ({1,+,1}<nuw><nsw><%b1> /u 0) U: empty-set S: empty-set Exits: <<Unknown>> LoopDispositions: { %b1: Computable }
+; CHECK-NEXT:    %add = add i32 %phi2, 1
+; CHECK-NEXT:    --> {2,+,1}<nuw><nsw><%b1> U: [2,3) S: [2,3) Exits: <<Unknown>> LoopDispositions: { %b1: Computable }
+; CHECK-NEXT:  Determining loop execution counts for: @widget
+; CHECK-NEXT:  Loop %b1: <multiple exits> Unpredictable backedge-taken count.
+; CHECK-NEXT:    exit count for b1: ***COULDNOTCOMPUTE***
+; CHECK-NEXT:    exit count for b3: i32 0
+; CHECK-NEXT:  Loop %b1: constant max backedge-taken count is i32 0
+; CHECK-NEXT:  Loop %b1: symbolic max backedge-taken count is i32 0
+; CHECK-NEXT:    symbolic max exit count for b1: ***COULDNOTCOMPUTE***
+; CHECK-NEXT:    symbolic max exit count for b3: i32 0
+;
+b:
+  br label %b1
+
+b1:                                              ; preds = %b5, %b
+  %phi = phi i32 [ 0, %b ], [ %udiv6, %b5 ]
+  %phi2 = phi i32 [ 1, %b ], [ %add, %b5 ]
+  %icmp = icmp eq i32 %phi, 0
+  br i1 %icmp, label %b3, label %b8
+
+b3:                                              ; preds = %b1
+  %udiv = udiv i32 10, %phi2
+  %urem = urem i32 %udiv, 10
+  %icmp4 = icmp eq i32 %urem, 0
+  br i1 %icmp4, label %b7, label %b5
+
+b5:                                              ; preds = %b3
+  %udiv6 = udiv i32 %phi2, 0
+  %add = add i32 %phi2, 1
+  br label %b1
+
+b7:                                              ; preds = %b3
+  ret i32 5
+
+b8:                                              ; preds = %b1
+  ret i32 7
+}
+
+; Don't fold %indvar2 into (zext {0,+,1}) * %a
+define i64 @test_poisonous(i64 %a, i32 %n) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: 'test_poisonous'
+; CHECK-NEXT:  Classifying expressions for: @test_poisonous
+; CHECK-NEXT:    %indvar1 = phi i32 [ 0, %entry ], [ %indvar1.next, %loop.body ]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    --> {0,+,1}<%loop.body> U: full-set S: full-set Exits: <<Unknown>> LoopDispositions: { %loop.body: Computable }
+; CHECK-NEXT:    %indvar2 = phi i64 [ 0, %entry ], [ %mul, %loop.body ]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    --> %indvar2 U: full-set S: full-set Exits: <<Unknown>> LoopDispositions: { %loop.body: Variant }
+; CHECK-NEXT:    %indvar1.next = add i32 %indvar1, 1
+; CHECK-NEXT:    --> {1,+,1}<%loop.body> U: full-set S: full-set Exits: <<Unknown>> LoopDispositions: { %loop.body: Computable }
+; CHECK-NEXT:    %ext = zext i32 %indvar1.next to i64
+; CHECK-NEXT:    --> (zext i32 {1,+,1}<%loop.body> to i64) U: [0,4294967296) S: [0,4294967296) Exits: <<Unknown>> LoopDispositions: { %loop.body: Computable }
+; CHECK-NEXT:    %mul = mul i64 %ext, %a
+; CHECK-NEXT:    --> ((zext i32 {1,+,1}<%loop.body> to i64) * %a) U: full-set S: full-set Exits: <<Unknown>> LoopDispositions: { %loop.body: Computable }
+; CHECK-NEXT:  Determining loop execution counts for: @test_poisonous
+; CHECK-NEXT:  Loop %loop.body: Unpredictable backedge-taken count.
+; CHECK-NEXT:  Loop %loop.body: Unpredictable constant max backedge-taken count.
+; CHECK-NEXT:  Loop %loop.body: Unpredictable symbolic max backedge-taken count.
+; CHECK-NEXT:  Loop %loop.body: Predicated backedge-taken count is (-1 + (1 smax (1 + (sext i32 %n to i64))<nsw>))<nsw>
+; CHECK-NEXT:   Predicates:
+; CHECK-NEXT:      {1,+,1}<%loop.body> Added Flags: <nssw>
+; CHECK-NEXT:  Loop %loop.body: Predicated constant max backedge-taken count is i64 2147483647
+; CHECK-NEXT:   Predicates:
+; CHECK-NEXT:      {1,+,1}<%loop.body> Added Flags: <nssw>
+; CHECK-NEXT:  Loop %loop.body: Predicated symbolic max backedge-taken count is (-1 + (1 smax (1 + (sext i32 %n to i64))<nsw>))<nsw>
+; CHECK-NEXT:   Predicates:
+; CHECK-NEXT:      {1,+,1}<%loop.body> Added Flags: <nssw>
+;
+entry:
+  br label %loop.body
+
+loop.body:
+  %indvar1 = phi i32 [ 0, %entry ], [ %indvar1.next, %loop.body ]
+  %indvar2 = phi i64 [ 0, %entry ], [ %mul, %loop.body ]
+  %indvar1.next = add i32 %indvar1, 1
+  %ext = zext i32 %indvar1.next to i64
+  %mul = mul i64 %ext, %a
+  %exitcond = icmp sgt i32 %indvar1.next, %n
+  br i1 %exitcond, label %loop.exit, label %loop.body
+
+loop.exit:
+  ret i64 %mul
+}

diff  --git a/llvm/test/Transforms/IndVarSimplify/pr117133.ll b/llvm/test/Transforms/IndVarSimplify/pr117133.ll
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000000..f62dc3f04a0966
--- /dev/null
+++ b/llvm/test/Transforms/IndVarSimplify/pr117133.ll
@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
+; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_test_checks.py UTC_ARGS: --version 5
+; RUN: opt -S -passes=indvars < %s | FileCheck %s
+
+define i32 @widget() {
+; CHECK-LABEL: define i32 @widget() {
+; CHECK-NEXT:  [[B:.*:]]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    br label %[[B1:.*]]
+; CHECK:       [[B1]]:
+; CHECK-NEXT:    br i1 true, label %[[B3:.*]], label %[[B8:.*]]
+; CHECK:       [[B3]]:
+; CHECK-NEXT:    br i1 true, label %[[B7:.*]], label %[[B5:.*]]
+; CHECK:       [[B5]]:
+; CHECK-NEXT:    br label %[[B1]]
+; CHECK:       [[B7]]:
+; CHECK-NEXT:    ret i32 5
+; CHECK:       [[B8]]:
+; CHECK-NEXT:    ret i32 7
+;
+b:
+  br label %b1
+
+b1:
+  %phi = phi i32 [ 0, %b ], [ %udiv6, %b5 ]
+  %phi2 = phi i32 [ 1, %b ], [ %add, %b5 ]
+  %icmp = icmp eq i32 %phi, 0
+  br i1 %icmp, label %b3, label %b8
+
+b3:
+  %udiv = udiv i32 10, %phi2
+  %urem = urem i32 %udiv, 10
+  %icmp4 = icmp eq i32 %urem, 0
+  br i1 %icmp4, label %b7, label %b5
+
+b5:
+  %udiv6 = udiv i32 %phi2, 0
+  %add = add i32 %phi2, 1
+  br label %b1
+
+b7:
+  ret i32 5
+
+b8:
+  ret i32 7
+}


        


More information about the llvm-commits mailing list