[llvm] [MemorySSA] Handle MemoryDef optimized away during cloning (PR #117883)
Nikita Popov via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Nov 27 05:56:28 PST 2024
https://github.com/nikic created https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/117883
When determining the replacement access during cloning, we currently leave accesses for instructions that are not in the VMap alone. This is correct if the instruction is not in VMap because it hasn't been cloned, but not if it has been cloned and then removed. In that case, we should walk up to the defining access, like in other simplification cases.
To distinguish the two cases, pass in a callback that queries whether the instruction is part of the cloned region.
An alternative to this would be to delay removal of dead instructions in SimpleLoopUnswitch until after MSSA cloning.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/116228.
>From 42ead244f7e1ea24723b168e4a0039e363585c04 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nikita Popov <npopov at redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2024 12:56:24 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] [MemorySSA] Handle MemoryDef optimized away during cloning
When determining the replacement access during cloning, we currently
leave accesses for instructions that are not in the VMap alone.
This is correct if the instruction is not in VMap because it hasn't
been cloned, but not if it has been cloned and then removed.
In that case, we should walk up to the defining access, like in
other simplification cases.
To distinguish the two cases, pass in a callback that queries
where the instruction is part of the cloned region.
An alternative to this would be to delay removal of dead
instructions in SimpleLoopUnswitch until after MSSA cloning.
---
llvm/include/llvm/Analysis/MemorySSAUpdater.h | 2 +
llvm/lib/Analysis/MemorySSAUpdater.cpp | 68 +++++++++++--------
llvm/test/Analysis/MemorySSA/pr116227.ll | 61 +++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 102 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 llvm/test/Analysis/MemorySSA/pr116227.ll
diff --git a/llvm/include/llvm/Analysis/MemorySSAUpdater.h b/llvm/include/llvm/Analysis/MemorySSAUpdater.h
index 055feceefb0546..b925ddd5de12a7 100644
--- a/llvm/include/llvm/Analysis/MemorySSAUpdater.h
+++ b/llvm/include/llvm/Analysis/MemorySSAUpdater.h
@@ -276,7 +276,9 @@ class MemorySSAUpdater {
// representation for. No other cases are supported.
void cloneUsesAndDefs(BasicBlock *BB, BasicBlock *NewBB,
const ValueToValueMapTy &VMap, PhiToDefMap &MPhiMap,
+ function_ref<bool(BasicBlock *)> IsInClonedRegion,
bool CloneWasSimplified = false);
+
template <typename Iter>
void privateUpdateExitBlocksForClonedLoop(ArrayRef<BasicBlock *> ExitBlocks,
Iter ValuesBegin, Iter ValuesEnd,
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Analysis/MemorySSAUpdater.cpp b/llvm/lib/Analysis/MemorySSAUpdater.cpp
index f672bd0e1e133e..7226963e9e7d0a 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Analysis/MemorySSAUpdater.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Analysis/MemorySSAUpdater.cpp
@@ -565,24 +565,26 @@ static MemoryAccess *onlySingleValue(MemoryPhi *MP) {
return MA;
}
-static MemoryAccess *getNewDefiningAccessForClone(MemoryAccess *MA,
- const ValueToValueMapTy &VMap,
- PhiToDefMap &MPhiMap,
- MemorySSA *MSSA) {
+static MemoryAccess *getNewDefiningAccessForClone(
+ MemoryAccess *MA, const ValueToValueMapTy &VMap, PhiToDefMap &MPhiMap,
+ MemorySSA *MSSA, function_ref<bool(BasicBlock *BB)> IsInClonedRegion) {
MemoryAccess *InsnDefining = MA;
if (MemoryDef *DefMUD = dyn_cast<MemoryDef>(InsnDefining)) {
- if (!MSSA->isLiveOnEntryDef(DefMUD)) {
- Instruction *DefMUDI = DefMUD->getMemoryInst();
- assert(DefMUDI && "Found MemoryUseOrDef with no Instruction.");
- if (Instruction *NewDefMUDI =
- cast_or_null<Instruction>(VMap.lookup(DefMUDI))) {
- InsnDefining = MSSA->getMemoryAccess(NewDefMUDI);
- if (!InsnDefining || isa<MemoryUse>(InsnDefining)) {
- // The clone was simplified, it's no longer a MemoryDef, look up.
- InsnDefining = getNewDefiningAccessForClone(
- DefMUD->getDefiningAccess(), VMap, MPhiMap, MSSA);
- }
- }
+ if (MSSA->isLiveOnEntryDef(DefMUD))
+ return DefMUD;
+
+ // If the MemoryDef is not part of the cloned region, leave it alone.
+ Instruction *DefMUDI = DefMUD->getMemoryInst();
+ assert(DefMUDI && "Found MemoryUseOrDef with no Instruction.");
+ if (!IsInClonedRegion(DefMUDI->getParent()))
+ return DefMUD;
+
+ auto *NewDefMUDI = cast_or_null<Instruction>(VMap.lookup(DefMUDI));
+ InsnDefining = NewDefMUDI ? MSSA->getMemoryAccess(NewDefMUDI) : nullptr;
+ if (!InsnDefining || isa<MemoryUse>(InsnDefining)) {
+ // The clone was simplified, it's no longer a MemoryDef, look up.
+ InsnDefining = getNewDefiningAccessForClone(
+ DefMUD->getDefiningAccess(), VMap, MPhiMap, MSSA, IsInClonedRegion);
}
} else {
MemoryPhi *DefPhi = cast<MemoryPhi>(InsnDefining);
@@ -593,10 +595,10 @@ static MemoryAccess *getNewDefiningAccessForClone(MemoryAccess *MA,
return InsnDefining;
}
-void MemorySSAUpdater::cloneUsesAndDefs(BasicBlock *BB, BasicBlock *NewBB,
- const ValueToValueMapTy &VMap,
- PhiToDefMap &MPhiMap,
- bool CloneWasSimplified) {
+void MemorySSAUpdater::cloneUsesAndDefs(
+ BasicBlock *BB, BasicBlock *NewBB, const ValueToValueMapTy &VMap,
+ PhiToDefMap &MPhiMap, function_ref<bool(BasicBlock *)> IsInClonedRegion,
+ bool CloneWasSimplified) {
const MemorySSA::AccessList *Acc = MSSA->getBlockAccesses(BB);
if (!Acc)
return;
@@ -615,7 +617,7 @@ void MemorySSAUpdater::cloneUsesAndDefs(BasicBlock *BB, BasicBlock *NewBB,
MemoryAccess *NewUseOrDef = MSSA->createDefinedAccess(
NewInsn,
getNewDefiningAccessForClone(MUD->getDefiningAccess(), VMap,
- MPhiMap, MSSA),
+ MPhiMap, MSSA, IsInClonedRegion),
/*Template=*/CloneWasSimplified ? nullptr : MUD,
/*CreationMustSucceed=*/false);
if (NewUseOrDef)
@@ -668,8 +670,13 @@ void MemorySSAUpdater::updateForClonedLoop(const LoopBlocksRPO &LoopBlocks,
ArrayRef<BasicBlock *> ExitBlocks,
const ValueToValueMapTy &VMap,
bool IgnoreIncomingWithNoClones) {
- PhiToDefMap MPhiMap;
+ SmallSetVector<BasicBlock *, 16> Blocks;
+ for (BasicBlock *BB : concat<BasicBlock *const>(LoopBlocks, ExitBlocks))
+ Blocks.insert(BB);
+ auto IsInClonedRegion = [&](BasicBlock *BB) { return Blocks.contains(BB); };
+
+ PhiToDefMap MPhiMap;
auto FixPhiIncomingValues = [&](MemoryPhi *Phi, MemoryPhi *NewPhi) {
assert(Phi && NewPhi && "Invalid Phi nodes.");
BasicBlock *NewPhiBB = NewPhi->getBlock();
@@ -692,9 +699,10 @@ void MemorySSAUpdater::updateForClonedLoop(const LoopBlocksRPO &LoopBlocks,
continue;
// Determine incoming value and add it as incoming from IncBB.
- NewPhi->addIncoming(
- getNewDefiningAccessForClone(IncomingAccess, VMap, MPhiMap, MSSA),
- IncBB);
+ NewPhi->addIncoming(getNewDefiningAccessForClone(IncomingAccess, VMap,
+ MPhiMap, MSSA,
+ IsInClonedRegion),
+ IncBB);
}
if (auto *SingleAccess = onlySingleValue(NewPhi)) {
MPhiMap[Phi] = SingleAccess;
@@ -716,13 +724,13 @@ void MemorySSAUpdater::updateForClonedLoop(const LoopBlocksRPO &LoopBlocks,
MPhiMap[MPhi] = NewPhi;
}
// Update Uses and Defs.
- cloneUsesAndDefs(BB, NewBlock, VMap, MPhiMap);
+ cloneUsesAndDefs(BB, NewBlock, VMap, MPhiMap, IsInClonedRegion);
};
- for (auto *BB : llvm::concat<BasicBlock *const>(LoopBlocks, ExitBlocks))
+ for (auto *BB : Blocks)
ProcessBlock(BB);
- for (auto *BB : llvm::concat<BasicBlock *const>(LoopBlocks, ExitBlocks))
+ for (auto *BB : Blocks)
if (MemoryPhi *MPhi = MSSA->getMemoryAccess(BB))
if (MemoryAccess *NewPhi = MPhiMap.lookup(MPhi))
FixPhiIncomingValues(MPhi, cast<MemoryPhi>(NewPhi));
@@ -741,7 +749,9 @@ void MemorySSAUpdater::updateForClonedBlockIntoPred(
PhiToDefMap MPhiMap;
if (MemoryPhi *MPhi = MSSA->getMemoryAccess(BB))
MPhiMap[MPhi] = MPhi->getIncomingValueForBlock(P1);
- cloneUsesAndDefs(BB, P1, VM, MPhiMap, /*CloneWasSimplified=*/true);
+ cloneUsesAndDefs(
+ BB, P1, VM, MPhiMap, [&](BasicBlock *BB) { return BB == P1; },
+ /*CloneWasSimplified=*/true);
}
template <typename Iter>
diff --git a/llvm/test/Analysis/MemorySSA/pr116227.ll b/llvm/test/Analysis/MemorySSA/pr116227.ll
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000000..cd9686b018aa62
--- /dev/null
+++ b/llvm/test/Analysis/MemorySSA/pr116227.ll
@@ -0,0 +1,61 @@
+; RUN: opt -disable-output -passes="loop-mssa(simple-loop-unswitch<nontrivial>),print<memoryssa>" -verify-memoryssa < %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
+
+declare ptr @malloc() allockind("alloc,uninitialized")
+
+; CHECK-LABEL: MemorySSA for function: test
+
+; CHECK: for.body.us:
+; CHECK-NEXT: 3 = MemoryPhi({entry.split.us,liveOnEntry},{for.body.us,3})
+
+; CHECK: for.body:
+; CHECK-NEXT: 2 = MemoryPhi({entry.split,liveOnEntry},{for.body,1})
+; CHECK-NEXT: 1 = MemoryDef(2)
+; CHECK-NEXT: %call.i = call ptr @malloc()
+
+define void @test(i1 %arg) {
+entry:
+ br label %for.body
+
+for.body:
+ %call.i = call ptr @malloc()
+ %cmp.i = icmp ne ptr %call.i, null
+ %or.cond.i = select i1 %cmp.i, i1 %arg, i1 false
+ br i1 %or.cond.i, label %exit, label %for.body
+
+exit:
+ ret void
+}
+
+; CHECK-LABEL: MemorySSA for function: test_extra_defs
+
+; CHECK: entry:
+; CHECK-NEXT: 1 = MemoryDef(liveOnEntry)
+; CHECK-NEXT: store i8 1, ptr %p, align 1
+
+; CHECK: for.body.us:
+; CHECK-NEXT: 5 = MemoryPhi({entry.split.us,1},{for.body.us,6})
+; CHECK-NEXT: 6 = MemoryDef(5)
+; CHECK-NEXT: store i8 2, ptr %p, align 1
+
+; CHECK: for.body:
+; CHECK-NEXT: 4 = MemoryPhi({entry.split,1},{for.body,3})
+; CHECK-NEXT: 2 = MemoryDef(4)
+; CHECK-NEXT: store i8 2, ptr %p
+; CHECK-NEXT: 3 = MemoryDef(2)
+; CHECK-NEXT: %call.i = call ptr @malloc()
+
+define void @test_extra_defs(ptr %p, i1 %arg) {
+entry:
+ store i8 1, ptr %p
+ br label %for.body
+
+for.body:
+ store i8 2, ptr %p
+ %call.i = call ptr @malloc()
+ %cmp.i = icmp ne ptr %call.i, null
+ %or.cond.i = select i1 %cmp.i, i1 %arg, i1 false
+ br i1 %or.cond.i, label %exit, label %for.body
+
+exit:
+ ret void
+}
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list