[llvm] [BOLT] Skip _init; avoiding GOT breakage for static binaries (PR #117751)

[via llvm-commits]

github-actions[bot] wrote:

<!--LLVM CODE FORMAT COMMENT: {clang-format}-->


:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code. :warning:

<details>
<summary>
You can test this locally with the following command:
</summary>

``````````bash
git-clang-format --diff 0ccc3895126aaa94ae3fe890fcca0ad69658bbab 4683703ccd54ba5cb39fdfba471e66746d102e3d --extensions cpp -- bolt/lib/Rewrite/RewriteInstance.cpp
``````````

</details>

<details>
<summary>
View the diff from clang-format here.
</summary>

``````````diff
diff --git a/bolt/lib/Rewrite/RewriteInstance.cpp b/bolt/lib/Rewrite/RewriteInstance.cpp
index bfef815c73..89eb323dbe 100644
--- a/bolt/lib/Rewrite/RewriteInstance.cpp
+++ b/bolt/lib/Rewrite/RewriteInstance.cpp
@@ -2936,7 +2936,7 @@ static bool isInitFunction(const BinaryFunction &Function) {
   // moved _init, causing a runtime crash. Skipping _init on the other
   // hand should be harmless.
   bool ShouldSkip =
-    Function.hasName("_init") && Function.getOriginSectionName() == ".init";
+      Function.hasName("_init") && Function.getOriginSectionName() == ".init";
   if (ShouldSkip)
     LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "BOLT-DEBUG: skip _init in for GOT workaround.\n");
   return ShouldSkip;

``````````

</details>


https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/117751