[llvm] Bail out jump threading on indirect branches (PR #103688)

[Nikita Popov via llvm-commits]

nikic wrote:

Sorry for not following up here before...

> It didn't occur to me that there would be any violation of some sorts. I pushed the latest change last week and there wasn't any feedback since then.

Please see https://llvm.org/docs/CodeReview.html#code-review-workflow. If you submit a PR, you need to wait for an explicit approval. Ping the PR if needed. Lack of response is not the same as approval.

This PR did not even take into account the feedback that *was* provided. If the test case had been properly minimized, it would have been clearer that this is not the correct bailout condition.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/103688