[clang] [clang-tools-extra] [llvm] [clang] Introduce diagnostics suppression mappings (PR #112517)

[Boaz Brickner via llvm-commits]

================
@@ -477,6 +485,100 @@ void DiagnosticsEngine::setSeverityForAll(diag::Flavor Flavor,
       setSeverity(Diag, Map, Loc);
 }
 
+namespace {
+class WarningsSpecialCaseList : public llvm::SpecialCaseList {
+public:
+  static std::unique_ptr<WarningsSpecialCaseList>
+  create(const llvm::MemoryBuffer &MB, std::string &Err) {
+    auto SCL = std::make_unique<WarningsSpecialCaseList>();
+    if (SCL->createInternal(&MB, Err))
+      return SCL;
+    return nullptr;
+  }
+
+  // Section names refer to diagnostic groups, which cover multiple individual
+  // diagnostics. Expand diagnostic groups here to individual diagnostics.
+  // A diagnostic can have multiple diagnostic groups associated with it, we let
+  // the last section take precedence in such cases.
+  void processSections(DiagnosticsEngine &Diags) {
+    // Drop the default section introduced by special case list, we only support
+    // exact diagnostic group names.
+    Sections.erase("*");
+    // Make sure we iterate sections by their line numbers.
+    std::vector<std::pair<unsigned, const llvm::StringMapEntry<Section> *>>
+        LineAndSection;
+    for (const auto &Entry : Sections) {
+      LineAndSection.emplace_back(
+          Entry.second.SectionMatcher->Globs.at(Entry.first()).second, &Entry);
+    }
+    llvm::sort(LineAndSection);
+    static constexpr auto kFlavor = clang::diag::Flavor::WarningOrError;
+    for (const auto &[_, Entry] : LineAndSection) {
----------------
bricknerb wrote:

That's too bad, consider adding a FIXME if you think it's a good idea.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112517