[llvm] [AMDGPU][SIPreEmitPeephole] mustRetainExeczBranch: use BranchProbability and TargetSchedmodel (PR #109818)
Matt Arsenault via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Oct 7 02:53:11 PDT 2024
Juan Manuel Martinez =?utf-8?q?CaamaƱo?= <juamarti at amd.com>
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To: <llvm.org/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109818 at github.com>
================
@@ -304,11 +299,62 @@ bool SIPreEmitPeephole::getBlockDestinations(
return true;
}
+namespace {
+class BranchWeightCostModel {
+ const SIInstrInfo &TII;
+ const TargetSchedModel &SchedModel;
+ BranchProbability BranchProb;
+ static constexpr uint64_t BranchNotTakenCost = 1;
+ uint64_t BranchTakenCost;
+ uint64_t ThenCyclesCost = 0;
+
+public:
+ BranchWeightCostModel(const SIInstrInfo &TII, const MachineInstr &Branch,
+ const MachineBasicBlock &Succ)
+ : TII(TII), SchedModel(TII.getSchedModel()) {
+ assert(SchedModel.hasInstrSchedModelOrItineraries());
+
+ const MachineBasicBlock &Head = *Branch.getParent();
+ const auto *FromIt = find(Head.successors(), &Succ);
+ assert(FromIt != Head.succ_end());
+
+ BranchProb = Head.getSuccProbability(FromIt);
+ assert(!BranchProb.isUnknown());
----------------
arsenm wrote:
But does it matter that it underflowed? The logic will still come out to return false? This check is not required for correctness
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109818
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list