[llvm] [SimplifyCFG] Better aligned a comment. (PR #109307)

[via llvm-commits]

llvmbot wrote:


<!--LLVM PR SUMMARY COMMENT-->

@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-transforms

Author: Simone Campanoni (scampanoni)

<details>
<summary>Changes</summary>



---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109307.diff


1 Files Affected:

- (modified) llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/SimplifyCFG.cpp (+3-3) 


``````````diff
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/SimplifyCFG.cpp b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/SimplifyCFG.cpp
index c63618d9dd1297..2046ac4cc3ef52 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/SimplifyCFG.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/SimplifyCFG.cpp
@@ -405,9 +405,9 @@ static InstructionCost computeSpeculationCost(const User *I,
 }
 
 /// If we have a merge point of an "if condition" as accepted above,
-/// return true if the specified value dominates the block.  We
-/// don't handle the true generality of domination here, just a special case
-/// which works well enough for us.
+/// return true if the specified value dominates the block.  We don't handle
+/// the true generality of domination here, just a special case which works 
+/// well enough for us.
 ///
 /// If AggressiveInsts is non-null, and if V does not dominate BB, we check to
 /// see if V (which must be an instruction) and its recursive operands

``````````

</details>


https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109307